Re: 2.6.2 issues (IPSec+NAT, RFC2684 bridge)
From: Michal Ludvig <hidden>
Date: 2004-02-24 10:23:32
Also in:
netdev
Samofatov, Nickolay told me that:
Here is a list of minor issues I encountered when migrated my AMD64 machine to 2.6.2 kernel (64-bit). 1) Attempts to combine IPSec and NAT result in various kinds of failures. The easiest to reproduce is reliable hard system lock-up when IKE session needs to be initiated because of request from masqueraded machine. (workaround is to run cron job keeping IPSec connection active)
You probably hit the same bug as I did. When a SPD policy expires the notification to userspace fails. Please try the patch from here and let me know if it helps: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=107761652405761&w=2
2) I had to add following line to my routing rules to get IPSec working locally: -- route add -m 172.20.0.0 netmask 255.255.0.0 gw 172.21.113.1 -- 172.20.0.0 here is VPN subnet I'm interested in. 172.21.113.1 is the address assigned to eth0 interface which is also IP address of this machine in VPN. Before I added this rule TCP connections from localhost failed with no route to host. The result works for most applications, but not all. For example, SSH fails. (my workaround is to use SOCKS5 proxy running locally for local SSH connections over IPSec tunnels)
Try to specify source address as well: ip route add 172.20.0.0/16 via 172.21.113.1 src 172.21.x.x
If there is interest, I may provide as much information as required to resolve the problems.
If the IPsec issues still remain, send me more information so that I could reproduce it here. Michal Ludvig -- SUSE Labs mludvig@suse.cz | Cray is the only computer (+420) 296.545.373 http://www.suse.cz | that runs an endless loop Personal homepage http://www.logix.cz/michal | in just four hours.