[PATCH] docs: livepatch: Fix a typo in the file shadow-vars.rst

s/ varibles/variables/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <redacted>
---
 Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
--- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
+++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects

 Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
 variables alongside their parent objects.  Or a livepatch fix may
-require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
+require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
 these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
 shadow variables to parents already in-flight.

--

2.30.1

On Fri 2021-03-05 07:47:20, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

It might make sense to move the "In" to the next line. It sticks out
even more now.

Eitherway:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr

On 10:01 Fri 05 Mar 2021, Petr Mladek wrote:

On Fri 2021-03-05 07:47:20, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

quoted

s/ varibles/variables/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <redacted>
---
 Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
index c05715aeafa4..8464866d18ba 100644
--- a/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst
+++ b/Documentation/livepatch/shadow-vars.rst

@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ In-flight parent objects

 Sometimes it may not be convenient or possible to allocate shadow
 variables alongside their parent objects.  Or a livepatch fix may
-require shadow varibles to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
+require shadow variables to only a subset of parent object instances.  In
 these cases, the klp_shadow_get_or_alloc() call can be used to attach
 shadow variables to parents already in-flight.

It might make sense to move the "In" to the next line. It sticks out
even more now.

Eitherway:

Thanks, your wish will get fulfilled in V2 ...will send your way :)

~Bhaskar

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr