Re: [PATCH 00/22] Replace comments with C99 initializers
From: Benjamin Stürz <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-28 11:54:33
Also in:
linux-acpi, linux-arm-kernel, linux-edac, linux-gpio, linux-input, linux-media, linux-pci, linux-rdma, linux-samsung-soc, linux-wireless, lkml, netdev
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2022-03-28 · Re: [PATCH 00/22] Replace comments with C99 initializers · Daniel Thompson <hidden>
- 2022-03-28 · Re: [PATCH 00/22] Replace comments with C99 initializers · Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
- 2022-03-27 · [PATCH 00/22] Replace comments with C99 initializers · Benjamin Stürz <hidden>
On 28.03.22 11:33, Kalle Valo wrote:
Benjamin Stürz [off-list ref] writes:quoted
This patch series replaces comments with C99's designated initializers in a few places. It also adds some enum initializers. This is my first time contributing to the Linux kernel, therefore I'm probably doing a lot of things the wrong way. I'm sorry for that.Just a small tip: If you are new, start with something small and learn from that. Don't do a controversial big patchset spanning multiple subsystems, that's the hard way to learn things. First submit one patch at a time to one subsystem and gain understanding of the process that way.
I actually thought this would be such simple thing. Do you know of any good thing where to start? I already looked into drivers/staging/*/TODO and didn't found something for me personally. Should I drop this patchset and start with something different? If yes, what would the proper way to drop it? Just announcing, that this is going nowhere in a separate patch?