# Re: \[PATCH 04/11\] x86/sme: Replace occurrences of sme\_active() with prot\_guest\_has()

- From: Joerg Roedel \<joro@8bytes.org\>
- Date: 2021-08-02 10:37:53 
- List: linuxppc-dev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2021/08/211437
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2021/07/211118/t.md

```text
On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 05:26:07PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Replace occurrences of sme_active() with the more generic prot_guest_has()
> using PATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT, except for in arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt*.c
> where PATTR_SME will be used. If future support is added for other memory
> encryption technologies, the use of PATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT can be
> updated, as required, to use PATTR_SME.
> 
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>

Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <redacted>
```