[PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc/uaccess: Don't use "m<>" constraint with GCC 4.9

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest · Maintainers: Madhavan Srinivasan, Linus Torvalds

STALE2146d REVIEWED: 1 (0M)

Status: Reviewed.

1 review trailer.

4 messages, 2 authors, 2020-12-10 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc/uaccess: Don't use "m<>" constraint with GCC 4.9

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-22 09:29:26

GCC 4.9 sometimes fails to build with "m<>" constraint in
inline assembly.

  CC      lib/iov_iter.o
In file included from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:6:0,
                 from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h:11,
                 from ./include/linux/atomic.h:7,
                 from ./include/linux/crypto.h:15,
                 from ./include/crypto/hash.h:11,
                 from lib/iov_iter.c:2:
lib/iov_iter.c: In function 'iovec_from_user.part.30':
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:287:2: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints
  __asm__ __volatile__(    \
  ^
./include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                                          ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:583:34: note: in expansion of macro 'unsafe_op_wrap'
 #define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) unsafe_op_wrap(__get_user_allowed(x, p), e)
                                  ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:329:10: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_asm'
  case 4: __get_user_asm(x, (u32 __user *)ptr, retval, "lwz"); break; \
          ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:363:3: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_size_allowed'
   __get_user_size_allowed(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err); \
   ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:100:2: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_nocheck'
  __get_user_nocheck((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)), false)
  ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:583:49: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_allowed'
 #define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) unsafe_op_wrap(__get_user_allowed(x, p), e)
                                                 ^
lib/iov_iter.c:1663:3: note: in expansion of macro 'unsafe_get_user'
   unsafe_get_user(len, &uiov[i].iov_len, uaccess_end);
   ^
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: lib/iov_iter.o] Error 1

Define a UPD_CONSTR macro that is "<>" by default and
only "" with GCC prior to GCC 5.

11 more lines

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-const.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-const.h
index 082c1538c562..0ce2368bd20f 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-const.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/asm-const.h
@@ -11,4 +11,17 @@
 #  define __ASM_CONST(x)	x##UL
 #  define ASM_CONST(x)		__ASM_CONST(x)
 #endif
+
+/*
+ * Inline assembly memory constraint
+ *
+ * GCC 4.9 doesn't properly handle pre update memory constraint "m<>"
+ *
+ */
+#if defined(GCC_VERSION) && GCC_VERSION < 50000
+#define UPD_CONSTR ""
+#else
+#define UPD_CONSTR "<>"
+#endif
+
 #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_ASM_CONST_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
index 604d705f1bb8..8f27ea48fadb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ do {								\
 		"1:	" op "%U1%X1 %0,%1	# put_user\n"	\
 		EX_TABLE(1b, %l2)				\
 		:						\
-		: "r" (x), "m<>" (*addr)				\
+		: "r" (x), "m"UPD_CONSTR (*addr)		\
 		:						\
 		: label)
 
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ extern long __get_user_bad(void);
 		".previous\n"				\
 		EX_TABLE(1b, 3b)			\
 		: "=r" (err), "=r" (x)			\
-		: "m<>" (*addr), "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
+		: "m"UPD_CONSTR (*addr), "i" (-EFAULT), "0" (err))
 
 #ifdef __powerpc64__
 #define __get_user_asm2(x, addr, err)			\
-- 
2.25.0

[PATCH v3 3/3] powerpc: Fix update form addressing in inline assembly

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-22 09:29:28

In several places, inline assembly uses the "%Un" modifier
to enable the use of instruction with update form addressing,
but the associated "<>" constraint is missing.

As mentioned in previous patch, this fails with gcc 4.9, so
"<>" can't be used directly.

Use UPD_CONSTR macro everywhere %Un modifier is used.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Segher Boessenkool <redacted>
---
v3: __set_pte_at() not impacted anymore (%U0 removed in previous patch)
v2: Build failure (circular inclusion) fixed by change in patch 1
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h | 9 +++++----
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h     | 4 ++--
 arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c        | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
index 8a55eb8cc97b..61c6e8b200e8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <asm/cmpxchg.h>
 #include <asm/barrier.h>
+#include <asm/asm-const.h>
 
 /*
  * Since *_return_relaxed and {cmp}xchg_relaxed are implemented with
@@ -26,14 +27,14 @@ static __inline__ int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v)
 {
 	int t;
 
-	__asm__ __volatile__("lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m"(v->counter));
+	__asm__ __volatile__("lwz%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m"UPD_CONSTR(v->counter));
 
 	return t;
 }
 
 static __inline__ void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i)
 {
-	__asm__ __volatile__("stw%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m"(v->counter) : "r"(i));
+	__asm__ __volatile__("stw%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m"UPD_CONSTR(v->counter) : "r"(i));
 }
 
 #define ATOMIC_OP(op, asm_op)						\
@@ -316,14 +317,14 @@ static __inline__ s64 atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
 {
 	s64 t;
 
-	__asm__ __volatile__("ld%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m"(v->counter));
+	__asm__ __volatile__("ld%U1%X1 %0,%1" : "=r"(t) : "m"UPD_CONSTR(v->counter));
 
 	return t;
 }
 
 static __inline__ void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, s64 i)
 {
-	__asm__ __volatile__("std%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m"(v->counter) : "r"(i));
+	__asm__ __volatile__("std%U0%X0 %1,%0" : "=m"UPD_CONSTR(v->counter) : "r"(i));
 }
 
 #define ATOMIC64_OP(op, asm_op)						\
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h
index 58635960403c..87964dfb838e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static inline u##size name(const volatile u##size __iomem *addr)	\
 {									\
 	u##size ret;							\
 	__asm__ __volatile__("sync;"#insn"%U1%X1 %0,%1;twi 0,%0,0;isync"\
-		: "=r" (ret) : "m" (*addr) : "memory");			\
+		: "=r" (ret) : "m"UPD_CONSTR (*addr) : "memory");	\
 	return ret;							\
 }
 
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static inline u##size name(const volatile u##size __iomem *addr)	\
 static inline void name(volatile u##size __iomem *addr, u##size val)	\
 {									\
 	__asm__ __volatile__("sync;"#insn"%U0%X0 %1,%0"			\
-		: "=m" (*addr) : "r" (val) : "memory");			\
+		: "=m"UPD_CONSTR (*addr) : "r" (val) : "memory");	\
 	mmiowb_set_pending();						\
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 13999123b735..cf52d26f49cd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -1087,7 +1087,7 @@ static inline u64 sp_to_dp(u32 fprs)
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	enable_kernel_fp();
-	asm ("lfs%U1%X1 0,%1; stfd%U0%X0 0,%0" : "=m" (fprd) : "m" (fprs)
+	asm ("lfs%U1%X1 0,%1; stfd%U0%X0 0,%0" : "=m"UPD_CONSTR (fprd) : "m"UPD_CONSTR (fprs)
 	     : "fr0");
 	preempt_enable();
 	return fprd;
@@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static inline u32 dp_to_sp(u64 fprd)
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	enable_kernel_fp();
-	asm ("lfd%U1%X1 0,%1; stfs%U0%X0 0,%0" : "=m" (fprs) : "m" (fprd)
+	asm ("lfd%U1%X1 0,%1; stfs%U0%X0 0,%0" : "=m"UPD_CONSTR (fprs) : "m"UPD_CONSTR (fprd)
 	     : "fr0");
 	preempt_enable();
 	return fprs;
-- 
2.25.0

[PATCH v3 2/3] powerpc: Fix incorrect stw{, ux, u, x} instructions in __set_pte_at

From: Christophe Leroy <hidden>
Date: 2020-10-22 09:29:31

From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>

The placeholder for instruction selection should use the second
argument's operand, which is %1, not %0. This could generate incorrect
assembly code if the memory addressing of operand %0 is a different
form from that of operand %1.

Also remove the %Un placeholder because having %Un placeholders
for two operands which are based on the same local var (ptep) doesn't
make much sense. By the way, it doesn't change the current behaviour
because "<>" constraint is missing for the associated "=m".

Fixes: 9bf2b5cdc5fe ("powerpc: Fixes for CONFIG_PTE_64BIT for SMP support")
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
Cc: Kumar Gala <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: <redacted>
Cc: <redacted> # v2.6.28+
Acked-by: Segher Boessenkool <redacted>
[chleroy: revised commit log iaw segher's comments and removed %U0]
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
v3: Remove %Un

v2: Changed commit log.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgtable.h | 4 ++--
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h    | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgtable.h
index 36443cda8dcf..41d8bc6db303 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/32/pgtable.h
@@ -522,9 +522,9 @@ static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 	if (pte_val(*ptep) & _PAGE_HASHPTE)
 		flush_hash_entry(mm, ptep, addr);
 	__asm__ __volatile__("\
-		stw%U0%X0 %2,%0\n\
+		stw%X0 %2,%0\n\
 		eieio\n\
-		stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
+		stw%X1 %L2,%1"
 	: "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
 	: "r" (pte) : "memory");
 
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
index 6277e7596ae5..ac75f4ab0dba 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/nohash/pgtable.h
@@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ static inline void __set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 	 */
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC32) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PTE_64BIT) && !percpu) {
 		__asm__ __volatile__("\
-			stw%U0%X0 %2,%0\n\
+			stw%X0 %2,%0\n\
 			eieio\n\
-			stw%U0%X0 %L2,%1"
+			stw%X1 %L2,%1"
 		: "=m" (*ptep), "=m" (*((unsigned char *)ptep+4))
 		: "r" (pte) : "memory");
 		return;
-- 
2.25.0

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] powerpc/uaccess: Don't use "m<>" constraint with GCC 4.9

From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2020-12-10 11:33:38

On Thu, 22 Oct 2020 09:29:19 +0000 (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote:
GCC 4.9 sometimes fails to build with "m<>" constraint in
inline assembly.

  CC      lib/iov_iter.o
In file included from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h:6:0,
                 from ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h:11,
                 from ./include/linux/atomic.h:7,
                 from ./include/linux/crypto.h:15,
                 from ./include/crypto/hash.h:11,
                 from lib/iov_iter.c:2:
lib/iov_iter.c: In function 'iovec_from_user.part.30':
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:287:2: error: 'asm' operand has impossible constraints
  __asm__ __volatile__(    \
  ^
./include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely'
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                                          ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:583:34: note: in expansion of macro 'unsafe_op_wrap'
 #define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) unsafe_op_wrap(__get_user_allowed(x, p), e)
                                  ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:329:10: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_asm'
  case 4: __get_user_asm(x, (u32 __user *)ptr, retval, "lwz"); break; \
          ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:363:3: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_size_allowed'
   __get_user_size_allowed(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err); \
   ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:100:2: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_nocheck'
  __get_user_nocheck((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)), false)
  ^
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h:583:49: note: in expansion of macro '__get_user_allowed'
 #define unsafe_get_user(x, p, e) unsafe_op_wrap(__get_user_allowed(x, p), e)
                                                 ^
lib/iov_iter.c:1663:3: note: in expansion of macro 'unsafe_get_user'
   unsafe_get_user(len, &uiov[i].iov_len, uaccess_end);
   ^
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283: lib/iov_iter.o] Error 1

[...]
Patches 2-3 applied to powerpc/next.

[2/3] powerpc: Fix incorrect stw{, ux, u, x} instructions in __set_pte_at
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d85be8a49e733dcd23674aa6202870d54bf5600d
[3/3] powerpc: Fix update form addressing in inline assembly
      https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/ff57698a9610fcf7d9c4469bf68c881eff22e2f8

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help