H_SUCCESS is only defined when CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES is defined.
!= H_SUCCESS means != 0. Modify the test accordingly.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Fixes: 65e701b2d2a8 ("powerpc/ptdump: drop non vital #ifdefs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
index a2c33efc7ce8..5b8bd34cd3a1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int pseries_find(unsigned long ea, int psize, bool primary, u64 *v, u64 *
for (i = 0; i < HPTES_PER_GROUP; i += 4, hpte_group += 4) {
lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_4(0, hpte_group, (void *)ptes);
- if (lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS)
+ if (lpar_rc)
continue;
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
if (HPTE_V_COMPARE(ptes[j].v, want_v) &&--
2.25.0
Christophe Leroy [off-list ref] writes:
H_SUCCESS is only defined when CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES is defined.
It's always defined in hvcall.h, but it doesn't always get included via
plpar_wrappers.h.
It looks to be CONFIG_SMP=n that causes that, for SMP=y we get a copy
via asm/spinlock.h
!= H_SUCCESS means != 0. Modify the test accordingly.
I guess that's an OK solution.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Fixes: 65e701b2d2a8 ("powerpc/ptdump: drop non vital #ifdefs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
I don't think it needs to go to stable, none of the defconfigs hit it,
we don't even really support SMP=n for 64-bit book3s.
cheers
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
index a2c33efc7ce8..5b8bd34cd3a1 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/ptdump/hashpagetable.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static int pseries_find(unsigned long ea, int psize, bool primary, u64 *v, u64 *
for (i = 0; i < HPTES_PER_GROUP; i += 4, hpte_group += 4) {
lpar_rc = plpar_pte_read_4(0, hpte_group, (void *)ptes);
- if (lpar_rc != H_SUCCESS)
+ if (lpar_rc)
continue;
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++) {
if (HPTE_V_COMPARE(ptes[j].v, want_v) &&--
2.25.0
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:18:39 +0000 (UTC), Christophe Leroy wrote:
H_SUCCESS is only defined when CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES is defined.
!= H_SUCCESS means != 0. Modify the test accordingly.
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc/ptdump: Fix build failure in hashpagetable.c
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7c466b0807960edc13e4b855be85ea765df9a6cd
cheers