[PATCH] powerpc/powernv/pci: add ifdef to avoid dead code

Commit dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE
configuration") removed a couple pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() calls.  The
only remaining calls are behind CONFIG_IOMMU_API.  Thus builds without
CONFIG_IOMMU_API see:
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1888:13: error: 'pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma' defined but not used

Add CONFIG_IOMMU_API ifdef guard to avoid dead code.

Fixes: dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE configuration")
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 73a63efcf855..f7762052b7c4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c

@@ -1885,6 +1885,7 @@ static bool pnv_pci_ioda_iommu_bypass_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	return false;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
 static void pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *dev;

@@ -1897,6 +1898,7 @@ static void pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus)
 			pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(pe, dev->subordinate);
 	}
 }
+#endif
 
 static inline __be64 __iomem *pnv_ioda_get_inval_reg(struct pnv_phb *phb,
 						     bool real_mode)

-- 
2.27.0.290.gba653c62da-goog

Hi,

Le 14/06/2020 à 07:54, Greg Thelen a écrit :

Commit dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE
configuration") removed a couple pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() calls.  The
only remaining calls are behind CONFIG_IOMMU_API.  Thus builds without
CONFIG_IOMMU_API see:
   arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1888:13: error: 'pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma' defined but not used

Add CONFIG_IOMMU_API ifdef guard to avoid dead code.

I think you should move the function down into the same ifdef as the 
callers instead of adding a new ifdef.

Christophe

Commit dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE
configuration") removed a couple pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() calls.  The
only remaining calls are behind CONFIG_IOMMU_API.  Thus builds without
CONFIG_IOMMU_API see:
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1888:13: error: 'pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma' defined but not used

Move pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() under CONFIG_IOMMU_API to avoid dead code.

Fixes: dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE configuration")
Signed-off-by: Greg Thelen <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 26 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
index 73a63efcf855..743d840712da 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c

@@ -1885,19 +1885,6 @@ static bool pnv_pci_ioda_iommu_bypass_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	return false;
 }
 
-static void pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus)
-{
-	struct pci_dev *dev;
-
-	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
-		set_iommu_table_base(&dev->dev, pe->table_group.tables[0]);
-		dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = pe->tce_bypass_base;
-
-		if ((pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL) && dev->subordinate)
-			pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(pe, dev->subordinate);
-	}
-}
-
 static inline __be64 __iomem *pnv_ioda_get_inval_reg(struct pnv_phb *phb,
 						     bool real_mode)
 {

@@ -2501,6 +2488,19 @@ static long pnv_pci_ioda2_unset_window(struct iommu_table_group *table_group,
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IOMMU_API
+static void pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, struct pci_bus *bus)
+{
+	struct pci_dev *dev;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
+		set_iommu_table_base(&dev->dev, pe->table_group.tables[0]);
+		dev->dev.archdata.dma_offset = pe->tce_bypass_base;
+
+		if ((pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_BUS_ALL) && dev->subordinate)
+			pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma(pe, dev->subordinate);
+	}
+}
+
 unsigned long pnv_pci_ioda2_get_table_size(__u32 page_shift,
 		__u64 window_size, __u32 levels)
 {

-- 
2.27.0.290.gba653c62da-goog

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:33 AM Greg Thelen [off-list ref] wrote:

Commit dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE
configuration") removed a couple pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() calls.  The
only remaining calls are behind CONFIG_IOMMU_API.  Thus builds without
CONFIG_IOMMU_API see:
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1888:13: error: 'pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma' defined but not used

Move pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() under CONFIG_IOMMU_API to avoid dead code.

Doh! Thanks for the fix.

Reviewed-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>

Oliver O'Halloran [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:33 AM Greg Thelen [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Commit dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE
configuration") removed a couple pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() calls.  The
only remaining calls are behind CONFIG_IOMMU_API.  Thus builds without
CONFIG_IOMMU_API see:
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1888:13: error: 'pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma' defined but not used

Move pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() under CONFIG_IOMMU_API to avoid dead code.

Doh! Thanks for the fix.

Reviewed-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>

Is there anything else needed from me on this patch?
Given that it fixes a 5.8 commit I figured it'd be 5.8 material.

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 5:13 AM Greg Thelen [off-list ref] wrote:

Oliver O'Halloran [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:33 AM Greg Thelen [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Commit dc3d8f85bb57 ("powerpc/powernv/pci: Re-work bus PE
configuration") removed a couple pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() calls.  The
only remaining calls are behind CONFIG_IOMMU_API.  Thus builds without
CONFIG_IOMMU_API see:
  arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c:1888:13: error: 'pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma' defined but not used

Move pnv_ioda_setup_bus_dma() under CONFIG_IOMMU_API to avoid dead code.

Doh! Thanks for the fix.

Reviewed-by: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>

Is there anything else needed from me on this patch?
Given that it fixes a 5.8 commit I figured it'd be 5.8 material.

Oh sorry, I completely forgot about this patch. I sent another series
that included a more-or-less identical fix after the kbuild robot sent
a reminder:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/list/?series=187630&state=*

That's current in powerpc/next, but if it's causing a build break then
I agree it should probably go into 5.8 too.

Oliver