From: Michael Neuling <hidden> Date: 2020-05-28 23:09:17
Currently when we boot on a big core system, we get this print:
[ 0.040500] Using small cores at SMT level
This is misleading as we've actually detected big cores.
This patch clears up the print to say we've detect big cores but are
using small cores for scheduling.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMTif(has_big_cores){-pr_info("Using small cores at SMT level\n");+pr_info("Big cores detected but using small core scheduling\n");power9_topology[0].mask=smallcore_smt_mask;powerpc_topology[0].mask=smallcore_smt_mask;}
From: Gautham R Shenoy <hidden> Date: 2020-06-02 14:58:22
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:07:31AM +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
Currently when we boot on a big core system, we get this print:
[ 0.040500] Using small cores at SMT level
This is misleading as we've actually detected big cores.
This patch clears up the print to say we've detect big cores but are
using small cores for scheduling.
@@ -1383,7 +1383,7 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMTif(has_big_cores){-pr_info("Using small cores at SMT level\n");+pr_info("Big cores detected but using small core scheduling\n");power9_topology[0].mask=smallcore_smt_mask;powerpc_topology[0].mask=smallcore_smt_mask;}
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden> Date: 2020-06-09 06:18:00
On Fri, 29 May 2020 09:07:31 +1000, Michael Neuling wrote:
Currently when we boot on a big core system, we get this print:
[ 0.040500] Using small cores at SMT level
This is misleading as we've actually detected big cores.
This patch clears up the print to say we've detect big cores but are
using small cores for scheduling.