From: Frederic Barrat <redacted>
[ Upstream commit 05dd7da76986937fb288b4213b1fa10dbe0d1b33 ]
The pci_dn structure used to store a pointer to the struct pci_dev, so
taking a reference on the device was required. However, the pci_dev
pointer was later removed from the pci_dn structure, but the reference
was kept for the npu device.
See commit 902bdc57451c ("powerpc/powernv/idoa: Remove unnecessary
pcidev from pci_dn").
We don't need to take a reference on the device when assigning the PE
as the struct pnv_ioda_pe is cleaned up at the same time as
the (physical) device is released. Doing so prevents the device from
being released, which is a problem for opencapi devices, since we want
to be able to remove them through PCI hotplug.
Now the ugly part: nvlink npu devices are not meant to be
released. Because of the above, we've always leaked a reference and
simply removing it now is dangerous and would likely require more
work. There's currently no release device callback for nvlink devices
for example. So to be safe, this patch leaks a reference on the npu
device, but only for nvlink and not opencapi.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191121134918.7155-2-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
@@ -1062,14 +1062,13 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE(struct pci_dev *dev)returnNULL;}-/* NOTE: We get only one ref to the pci_dev for the pdn, not for the-*pointerinthePEdatastructure,bothshouldbedestroyedatthe-*sametime.However,thisneedstobelookedatmorecloselyagain-*onceweactuallystartremovingthings(Hotplug,SR-IOV,...)+/* NOTE: We don't get a reference for the pointer in the PE+*datastructure,boththedeviceandPEstructuresshouldbe+*destroyedatthesametime.However,removingnvlink+*deviceswillneedsomework.**AtsomepointwewanttoremovethePDNcompletelyanyways*/-pci_dev_get(dev);pdn->pe_number=pe->pe_number;pe->flags=PNV_IODA_PE_DEV;pe->pdev=dev;
Hi,
Upstream commit 05dd7da76986937fb288b4213b1fa10dbe0d1b33 doesn't really
need to go to stable (any of 4.19, 5.4 and 5.5). While it's probably
safe, the patch replaces a refcount leak by another one, which makes
sense as part of the full series merged in 5.6-rc1, but isn't terribly
useful standalone on the current stable branches.
Fred
quoted hunk
The pci_dn structure used to store a pointer to the struct pci_dev, so
taking a reference on the device was required. However, the pci_dev
pointer was later removed from the pci_dn structure, but the reference
was kept for the npu device.
See commit 902bdc57451c ("powerpc/powernv/idoa: Remove unnecessary
pcidev from pci_dn").
We don't need to take a reference on the device when assigning the PE
as the struct pnv_ioda_pe is cleaned up at the same time as
the (physical) device is released. Doing so prevents the device from
being released, which is a problem for opencapi devices, since we want
to be able to remove them through PCI hotplug.
Now the ugly part: nvlink npu devices are not meant to be
released. Because of the above, we've always leaked a reference and
simply removing it now is dangerous and would likely require more
work. There's currently no release device callback for nvlink devices
for example. So to be safe, this patch leaks a reference on the npu
device, but only for nvlink and not opencapi.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Barrat <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191121134918.7155-2-fbarrat@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
@@ -1062,14 +1062,13 @@ static struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_ioda_setup_dev_PE(struct pci_dev *dev)returnNULL;}-/* NOTE: We get only one ref to the pci_dev for the pdn, not for the-*pointerinthePEdatastructure,bothshouldbedestroyedatthe-*sametime.However,thisneedstobelookedatmorecloselyagain-*onceweactuallystartremovingthings(Hotplug,SR-IOV,...)+/* NOTE: We don't get a reference for the pointer in the PE+*datastructure,boththedeviceandPEstructuresshouldbe+*destroyedatthesametime.However,removingnvlink+*deviceswillneedsomework.**AtsomepointwewanttoremovethePDNcompletelyanyways*/-pci_dev_get(dev);pdn->pe_number=pe->pe_number;pe->flags=PNV_IODA_PE_DEV;pe->pdev=dev;
Hi,
Upstream commit 05dd7da76986937fb288b4213b1fa10dbe0d1b33 doesn't
really need to go to stable (any of 4.19, 5.4 and 5.5). While it's
probably safe, the patch replaces a refcount leak by another one,
which makes sense as part of the full series merged in 5.6-rc1, but
isn't terribly useful standalone on the current stable branches.