At the time being we have something like
if (something) {
p = get();
if (p) {
if (something_wrong)
goto out;
...
return;
} else if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
p = get();
if (!p) {
if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
This is similar to
p = get();
if (something) {
if (p) {
if (something_wrong)
goto out;
...
return;
}
}
if (!p) {
if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)kcb=get_kprobe_ctlblk();/* Check we're not actually recursing */+p=get_kprobe(addr);if(kprobe_running()){-p=get_kprobe(addr);if(p){kprobe_opcode_tinsn=*p->ainsn.insn;if(kcb->kprobe_status==KPROBE_HIT_SS&&
@@ -308,22 +308,9 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)}prepare_singlestep(p,regs);return1;-}elseif(*addr!=BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION){-/* If trap variant, then it belongs not to us */-kprobe_opcode_tcur_insn=*addr;--if(is_trap(cur_insn))-gotono_kprobe;-/* The breakpoint instruction was removed by-*anothercpurightafterwehit,nofurther-*handlingofthisinterruptisappropriate-*/-ret=1;}-gotono_kprobe;}-p=get_kprobe(addr);if(!p){if(*addr!=BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION){/*
if (a) {
if (b)
do_something();
}
Is equivalent to
if (a & b)
do_something();
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
@@ -277,38 +277,36 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)/* Check we're not actually recursing */p=get_kprobe(addr);-if(kprobe_running()){-if(p){-kprobe_opcode_tinsn=*p->ainsn.insn;-if(kcb->kprobe_status==KPROBE_HIT_SS&&-is_trap(insn)){-/* Turn off 'trace' bits */-regs->msr&=~MSR_SINGLESTEP;-regs->msr|=kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;-gotono_kprobe;-}-/* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since-*anotherprobewashitwhilewithinthehandler.-*Weheresavetheoriginalkprobesvariablesand-*justsinglestepontheinstructionofthenewprobe-*withoutcallinganyuserhandlers.-*/-save_previous_kprobe(kcb);-set_current_kprobe(p,regs,kcb);-kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);-kcb->kprobe_status=KPROBE_REENTER;-if(p->ainsn.boostable>=0){-ret=try_to_emulate(p,regs);--if(ret>0){-restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);-preempt_enable_no_resched();-return1;-}+if(kprobe_running()&&p){+kprobe_opcode_tinsn=*p->ainsn.insn;++if(kcb->kprobe_status==KPROBE_HIT_SS&&is_trap(insn)){+/* Turn off 'trace' bits */+regs->msr&=~MSR_SINGLESTEP;+regs->msr|=kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;+gotono_kprobe;+}+/* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since+*anotherprobewashitwhilewithinthehandler.+*Weheresavetheoriginalkprobesvariablesand+*justsinglestepontheinstructionofthenewprobe+*withoutcallinganyuserhandlers.+*/+save_previous_kprobe(kcb);+set_current_kprobe(p,regs,kcb);+kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);+kcb->kprobe_status=KPROBE_REENTER;+if(p->ainsn.boostable>=0){+ret=try_to_emulate(p,regs);++if(ret>0){+restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);+preempt_enable_no_resched();+return1;}-prepare_singlestep(p,regs);-return1;}+prepare_singlestep(p,regs);+return1;}if(!p){
From: Naveen N. Rao <hidden> Date: 2020-02-18 14:40:00
Christophe Leroy wrote:
At the time being we have something like
if (something) {
p = get();
if (p) {
if (something_wrong)
goto out;
...
return;
} else if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
p = get();
if (!p) {
if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
This is similar to
p = get();
if (something) {
if (p) {
if (something_wrong)
goto out;
...
return;
}
}
if (!p) {
if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)kcb=get_kprobe_ctlblk();/* Check we're not actually recursing */+p=get_kprobe(addr);if(kprobe_running()){-p=get_kprobe(addr);if(p){kprobe_opcode_tinsn=*p->ainsn.insn;if(kcb->kprobe_status==KPROBE_HIT_SS&&
@@ -308,22 +308,9 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)}prepare_singlestep(p,regs);return1;-}elseif(*addr!=BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION){-/* If trap variant, then it belongs not to us */-kprobe_opcode_tcur_insn=*addr;--if(is_trap(cur_insn))-gotono_kprobe;-/* The breakpoint instruction was removed by-*anothercpurightafterwehit,nofurther-*handlingofthisinterruptisappropriate-*/-ret=1;}-gotono_kprobe;
A minot nit -- removing the above goto makes a slight change to the
logic. But, see my comments for the next patch.
- Naveen
}
- p = get_kprobe(addr);
if (!p) {
if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
/*
--
2.25.0
From: Naveen N. Rao <hidden> Date: 2020-02-18 14:41:05
Christophe Leroy wrote:
quoted hunk
if (a) {
if (b)
do_something();
}
Is equivalent to
if (a & b)
do_something();
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
@@ -277,38 +277,36 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)/* Check we're not actually recursing */p=get_kprobe(addr);-if(kprobe_running()){-if(p){-kprobe_opcode_tinsn=*p->ainsn.insn;-if(kcb->kprobe_status==KPROBE_HIT_SS&&-is_trap(insn)){-/* Turn off 'trace' bits */-regs->msr&=~MSR_SINGLESTEP;-regs->msr|=kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;-gotono_kprobe;-}-/* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since-*anotherprobewashitwhilewithinthehandler.-*Weheresavetheoriginalkprobesvariablesand-*justsinglestepontheinstructionofthenewprobe-*withoutcallinganyuserhandlers.-*/-save_previous_kprobe(kcb);-set_current_kprobe(p,regs,kcb);-kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);-kcb->kprobe_status=KPROBE_REENTER;-if(p->ainsn.boostable>=0){-ret=try_to_emulate(p,regs);--if(ret>0){-restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);-preempt_enable_no_resched();-return1;-}+if(kprobe_running()&&p){+kprobe_opcode_tinsn=*p->ainsn.insn;++if(kcb->kprobe_status==KPROBE_HIT_SS&&is_trap(insn)){+/* Turn off 'trace' bits */+regs->msr&=~MSR_SINGLESTEP;+regs->msr|=kcb->kprobe_saved_msr;+gotono_kprobe;+}+/* We have reentered the kprobe_handler(), since+*anotherprobewashitwhilewithinthehandler.+*Weheresavetheoriginalkprobesvariablesand+*justsinglestepontheinstructionofthenewprobe+*withoutcallinganyuserhandlers.+*/+save_previous_kprobe(kcb);+set_current_kprobe(p,regs,kcb);+kprobes_inc_nmissed_count(p);+kcb->kprobe_status=KPROBE_REENTER;+if(p->ainsn.boostable>=0){+ret=try_to_emulate(p,regs);++if(ret>0){+restore_previous_kprobe(kcb);+preempt_enable_no_resched();+return1;}-prepare_singlestep(p,regs);-return1;}+prepare_singlestep(p,regs);+return1;}
If we move the below !p case before the check for kprobe_running() right
after get_kprobe(), we won't need to check for (p) above and we won't
have any change in logic from Patch 1.
At the time being we have something like
if (something) {
p = get();
if (p) {
if (something_wrong)
goto out;
...
return;
} else if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
p = get();
if (!p) {
if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
This is similar to
p = get();
if (something) {
if (p) {
if (something_wrong)
goto out;
...
return;
}
}
if (!p) {
if (a != b) {
if (some_error)
goto out;
...
}
goto out;
}
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 15 +--------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 14 deletions(-)
Good cleanup, thanks.
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index f8b848aa65bd..7a925eb76ec0 100644
@@ -276,8 +276,8 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
kcb = get_kprobe_ctlblk();
/* Check we're not actually recursing */
+ p = get_kprobe(addr);
if (kprobe_running()) {
- p = get_kprobe(addr);
if (p) {
kprobe_opcode_t insn = *p->ainsn.insn;
if (kcb->kprobe_status == KPROBE_HIT_SS &&
@@ -308,22 +308,9 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
prepare_singlestep(p, regs);
return 1;
- } else if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
- /* If trap variant, then it belongs not to us */
- kprobe_opcode_t cur_insn = *addr;
-
- if (is_trap(cur_insn))
- goto no_kprobe;
- /* The breakpoint instruction was removed by
- * another cpu right after we hit, no further
- * handling of this interrupt is appropriate
- */
- ret = 1;
}
- goto no_kprobe;
A minot nit -- removing the above goto makes a slight change to the
logic. But, see my comments for the next patch.
All legs of the (p) case are have either a return or a goto, so that
goto no_kprobe is limited to the !p case, we have to fall_through now.
Christophe