# Re: \[PATCH v7 02/24\] mm/gup: factor out duplicate code from four routines

- From: John Hubbard \<jhubbard@nvidia.com\>
- Date: 2019-11-21 21:50:44 
- List: linuxppc-dev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2019/11/167434
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/bpf/2019/11/167331/t.md

```text
On 11/21/19 1:49 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 21-11-19 00:29:59, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 11/21/19 12:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Otherwise this looks fine and might be a worthwhile cleanup to feed
>>> Andrew for 5.5 independent of the gut of the changes.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the reviews! Say, it sounds like your view here is that this
>> series should be targeted at 5.6 (not 5.5), is that what you have in mind?
>> And get the preparatory patches (1-9, and maybe even 10-16) into 5.5?
>
> Yeah, actually I feel the same. The merge window is going to open on Sunday
> and the series isn't still fully baked and happily sitting in linux-next
> (and larger changes should really sit in linux-next for at least a week,
> preferably two, before the merge window opens to get some reasonable test
> coverage).  So I'd take out the independent easy patches that are already
> reviewed, get them merged into Andrew's (or whatever other appropriate
> tree) now so that they get at least a week of testing in linux-next before
> going upstream.  And the more involved bits will have to wait for 5.6 -
> which means let's just continue working on them as we do now because
> ideally in 4 weeks we should have them ready with all the reviews so that
> they can be picked up and integrated into linux-next.
>
> 								Honza

OK, thanks for spelling it out. I'll shift over to getting the easy patches
prepared for 5.5, for now.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
```