From: Greg Kurz <hidden> Date: 2018-12-17 02:16:50
All fields in the PE are big-endian. Use cpu_to_be32() like everywhere
else something is written to the PE. Otherwise a wrong TID will be used
by the NPU. If this TID happens to point to an existing thread sharing
the same mm, it could be woken up by error. This is highly improbable
though. The likely outcome of this is the NPU not finding the target
thread and forcing the AFU into sending an interrupt, which userspace
is supposed to handle anyway.
Fixes: e948e06fc63a ("ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on POWER9")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <redacted>
---
This bug remained unnoticed so far because the current OCXL test suite
happens to call OCXL_IOCTL_ENABLE_P9_WAIT before attaching a context.
This causes ocxl_link_update_pe() to be called before ocxl_link_add_pe()
which re-writes the TID in the PE with the appropriate endianness.
I have some patches that change the behavior of the OCXL test suite so that
it can catch the issue:
https://github.com/gkurz/libocxl/commits/wake-host-thread-rework
---
drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Andrew Donnellan <hidden> Date: 2018-12-17 00:00:52
On 17/12/18 8:28 am, Greg Kurz wrote:
All fields in the PE are big-endian. Use cpu_to_be32() like everywhere
else something is written to the PE. Otherwise a wrong TID will be used
by the NPU. If this TID happens to point to an existing thread sharing
the same mm, it could be woken up by error. This is highly improbable
though. The likely outcome of this is the NPU not finding the target
thread and forcing the AFU into sending an interrupt, which userspace
is supposed to handle anyway.
Fixes: e948e06fc63a ("ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on POWER9")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <redacted>
If only we read our sparse warnings which would have told us this. One
warning down :)
Thanks for finding this!
Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
quoted hunk
---
This bug remained unnoticed so far because the current OCXL test suite
happens to call OCXL_IOCTL_ENABLE_P9_WAIT before attaching a context.
This causes ocxl_link_update_pe() to be called before ocxl_link_add_pe()
which re-writes the TID in the PE with the appropriate endianness.
I have some patches that change the behavior of the OCXL test suite so that
it can catch the issue:
https://github.com/gkurz/libocxl/commits/wake-host-thread-rework
---
drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Sun, 2018-12-16 at 22:28 +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
quoted hunk
All fields in the PE are big-endian. Use cpu_to_be32() like
everywhere
else something is written to the PE. Otherwise a wrong TID will be
used
by the NPU. If this TID happens to point to an existing thread
sharing
the same mm, it could be woken up by error. This is highly improbable
though. The likely outcome of this is the NPU not finding the target
thread and forcing the AFU into sending an interrupt, which userspace
is supposed to handle anyway.
Fixes: e948e06fc63a ("ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on
POWER9")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <redacted>
---
This bug remained unnoticed so far because the current OCXL test
suite
happens to call OCXL_IOCTL_ENABLE_P9_WAIT before attaching a context.
This causes ocxl_link_update_pe() to be called before
ocxl_link_add_pe()
which re-writes the TID in the PE with the appropriate endianness.
I have some patches that change the behavior of the OCXL test suite
so that
it can catch the issue:
https://github.com/gkurz/libocxl/commits/wake-host-thread-rework
---
drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ int ocxl_link_update_pe(void *link_handle, int
pasid, __u16 tid)
mutex_lock(&spa->spa_lock);
- pe->tid = tid;
+ pe->tid = cpu_to_be32(tid);
/*
* The barrier makes sure the PE is updated
Good catch, thanks.
Reviewed-by: Alastair D'Silva <redacted>
--
Alastair D'Silva
Open Source Developer
Linux Technology Centre, IBM Australia
mob: 0423 762 819
From: Greg Kurz <hidden> Date: 2018-12-20 15:12:20
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 11:38:51 +1100
"Alastair D'Silva" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 2018-12-16 at 22:28 +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
quoted
All fields in the PE are big-endian. Use cpu_to_be32() like
everywhere
else something is written to the PE. Otherwise a wrong TID will be
used
by the NPU. If this TID happens to point to an existing thread
sharing
the same mm, it could be woken up by error. This is highly improbable
though. The likely outcome of this is the NPU not finding the target
thread and forcing the AFU into sending an interrupt, which userspace
is supposed to handle anyway.
Fixes: e948e06fc63a ("ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on
POWER9")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <redacted>
---
This bug remained unnoticed so far because the current OCXL test
suite
happens to call OCXL_IOCTL_ENABLE_P9_WAIT before attaching a context.
This causes ocxl_link_update_pe() to be called before
ocxl_link_add_pe()
which re-writes the TID in the PE with the appropriate endianness.
I have some patches that change the behavior of the OCXL test suite
so that
it can catch the issue:
https://github.com/gkurz/libocxl/commits/wake-host-thread-rework
---
drivers/misc/ocxl/link.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden> Date: 2018-12-22 17:01:03
On Sun, 2018-12-16 at 21:28:50 UTC, Greg Kurz wrote:
All fields in the PE are big-endian. Use cpu_to_be32() like everywhere
else something is written to the PE. Otherwise a wrong TID will be used
by the NPU. If this TID happens to point to an existing thread sharing
the same mm, it could be woken up by error. This is highly improbable
though. The likely outcome of this is the NPU not finding the target
thread and forcing the AFU into sending an interrupt, which userspace
is supposed to handle anyway.
Fixes: e948e06fc63a ("ocxl: Expose the thread_id needed for wait on POWER9")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.18
Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <redacted>
Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Alastair D'Silva <redacted>