Le 14/06/2018 à 12:25, Nicholas Piggin a écrit :
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:06:51 +0200
Christophe LEROY [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
See http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13395345/ for details
Seems like that function only exists when CONFIG_NMI_IPI is defined.
Problem introduced by commit 5cc05910f26e6fd6da15f052f86f6150e4b91664
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c?h=next-20180614&id=5cc05910f26e6fd6da15f052f86f6150e4b91664
What do you recommend to fix that ?
We could just do smp_call_function in the case we have no NMI_IPI?
???
Can you detail what you have in mind ? Do smp_call_function() to call
what ? Instead of the call to smp_send_safe_nmi_ipi() ?
Thanks
Christophe
Thanks,
Nick
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:51:28 +0200
Christophe LEROY [off-list ref] wrote:
Le 14/06/2018 =C3=A0 12:25, Nicholas Piggin a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
quoted
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 12:06:51 +0200
Christophe LEROY [off-list ref] wrote:
=20
quoted
See http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/13395345/ for deta=
ils
quoted
quoted
Seems like that function only exists when CONFIG_NMI_IPI is defined.
Problem introduced by commit 5cc05910f26e6fd6da15f052f86f6150e4b91664
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/co=
mmit/arch/powerpc/kernel/stacktrace.c?h=3Dnext-20180614&id=3D5cc05910f26e6f=
d6da15f052f86f6150e4b91664
quoted
quoted
What do you recommend to fix that ? =20
=20
We could just do smp_call_function in the case we have no NMI_IPI? =20
=20
???
=20
Can you detail what you have in mind ? Do smp_call_function() to call=20
what ? Instead of the call to smp_send_safe_nmi_ipi() ?
Yes I was thinking that but now I take a better look there's places that
call it with irqs off so that might be a bit risky. I guess just making
it depend on NMI_IPI for now is the minimum fix.
Thanks,
Nick