[PATCH] powerpc/msi: Remove VLA usage

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE2944d

6 messages, 4 authors, 2018-07-19 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] powerpc/msi: Remove VLA usage

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2018-06-29 18:55:06

In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
switches from an unchanging variable to a constant expression to eliminate
the VLA generation.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <redacted>
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <redacted>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c
index 6243a7e537d0..e64a411d1a00 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c
@@ -225,22 +225,23 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void)
 	struct device_node of_node;
 	struct property prop;
 	struct msi_bitmap bmp;
-	int size = 256;
-	DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, size);
+#define SIZE_EXPECTED 256
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, SIZE_EXPECTED);
 
 	/* There should really be a struct device_node allocator */
 	memset(&of_node, 0, sizeof(of_node));
 	of_node_init(&of_node);
 	of_node.full_name = node_name;
 
-	WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, &of_node));
+	WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, SIZE_EXPECTED, &of_node));
 
 	/* No msi-available-ranges, so expect > 0 */
 	WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) <= 0);
 
 	/* Should all still be free */
-	WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, get_count_order(size)));
-	bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(size));
+	WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, SIZE_EXPECTED,
+					get_count_order(SIZE_EXPECTED)));
+	bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(SIZE_EXPECTED));
 
 	/* Now create a fake msi-available-ranges property */
 
@@ -256,8 +257,8 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void)
 	WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp));
 
 	/* Check we got the expected result */
-	WARN_ON(bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, size));
-	WARN_ON(!bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, size));
+	WARN_ON(bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, SIZE_EXPECTED));
+	WARN_ON(!bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, SIZE_EXPECTED));
 
 	msi_bitmap_free(&bmp);
 	kfree(bmp.bitmap);
-- 
2.17.1


-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/msi: Remove VLA usage

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-17 03:56:59

On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
switches from an unchanging variable to a constant expression to eliminate
the VLA generation.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Friendly ping! Michael, can you take this?

-Kees

quoted hunk
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c
index 6243a7e537d0..e64a411d1a00 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c
@@ -225,22 +225,23 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void)
        struct device_node of_node;
        struct property prop;
        struct msi_bitmap bmp;
-       int size = 256;
-       DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, size);
+#define SIZE_EXPECTED 256
+       DECLARE_BITMAP(expected, SIZE_EXPECTED);

        /* There should really be a struct device_node allocator */
        memset(&of_node, 0, sizeof(of_node));
        of_node_init(&of_node);
        of_node.full_name = node_name;

-       WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, size, &of_node));
+       WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_alloc(&bmp, SIZE_EXPECTED, &of_node));

        /* No msi-available-ranges, so expect > 0 */
        WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp) <= 0);

        /* Should all still be free */
-       WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, size, get_count_order(size)));
-       bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(size));
+       WARN_ON(bitmap_find_free_region(bmp.bitmap, SIZE_EXPECTED,
+                                       get_count_order(SIZE_EXPECTED)));
+       bitmap_release_region(bmp.bitmap, 0, get_count_order(SIZE_EXPECTED));

        /* Now create a fake msi-available-ranges property */
@@ -256,8 +257,8 @@ static void __init test_of_node(void)
        WARN_ON(msi_bitmap_reserve_dt_hwirqs(&bmp));

        /* Check we got the expected result */
-       WARN_ON(bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, size));
-       WARN_ON(!bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, size));
+       WARN_ON(bitmap_parselist(expected_str, expected, SIZE_EXPECTED));
+       WARN_ON(!bitmap_equal(expected, bmp.bitmap, SIZE_EXPECTED));

        msi_bitmap_free(&bmp);
        kfree(bmp.bitmap);
--
2.17.1


--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security


-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/msi: Remove VLA usage

From: Tyrel Datwyler <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-17 21:12:55

On 06/29/2018 11:52 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
switches from an unchanging variable to a constant expression to eliminate
the VLA generation.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <redacted>
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <redacted>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
---
Reviewed-by: Tyrel Datwyler <redacted>

Re: powerpc/msi: Remove VLA usage

From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-19 06:07:53

On Fri, 2018-06-29 at 18:52:54 UTC, Kees Cook wrote:
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
switches from an unchanging variable to a constant expression to eliminate
the VLA generation.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <redacted>
Cc: Tyrel Datwyler <redacted>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/1b80ac648483189e45f60d4ddbb54b

cheers

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/msi: Remove VLA usage

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2018-07-19 12:17:15

Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
switches from an unchanging variable to a constant expression to eliminate
the VLA generation.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Friendly ping! Michael, can you take this?
Yep, sorry. I actually applied it weeks ago but hadn't pushed.

cheers

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/msi: Remove VLA usage

From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2018-07-19 18:34:01

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 5:17 AM, Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:
Kees Cook [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
In the quest to remove all stack VLA usage from the kernel[1], this
switches from an unchanging variable to a constant expression to eliminate
the VLA generation.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFzCG-zNmZwX4A2FQpadafLfEzK6CC=qPXydAacU1RqZWA@mail.gmail.com

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Friendly ping! Michael, can you take this?
Yep, sorry. I actually applied it weeks ago but hadn't pushed.
No worries! Thanks! :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help