[PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE3088d

3 messages, 3 authors, 2018-03-30 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES

From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-07 12:15:52

Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES these days.
Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only
with slice code.

Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
index c66cb06e73a1..337ef162851d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
 	 */
 	cmpdi	r9, 0
 	bne-	8f
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES
         /*
          * user space make sure we are within the allowed limit
 	 */
@@ -183,7 +185,6 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
 	 * really do dynamic patching unfortunately as processes might flip
 	 * between 4k and 64k standard page size
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES
 	/* r10 have esid */
 	cmpldi	r10,16
 	/* below SLICE_LOW_TOP */
-- 
2.14.3

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2018-03-30 12:35:19

"Aneesh Kumar K.V" [off-list ref] writes:
Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES these days.
Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available only
with slice code.
That file can only be built if PPC_MM_SLICES=y.

So let's just remove the ifdef entirely.

These days PPC_MM_SLICES == PPC_BOOK3S_64, so we should remove
PPC_MM_SLICES #defines wherever possible and replace them with
PPC_BOOK3S_64 otherwise IMO.

cheers
quoted hunk
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
index c66cb06e73a1..337ef162851d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
 	 */
 	cmpdi	r9, 0
 	bne-	8f
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES
         /*
          * user space make sure we are within the allowed limit
 	 */
@@ -183,7 +185,6 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
 	 * really do dynamic patching unfortunately as processes might flip
 	 * between 4k and 64k standard page size
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES
 	/* r10 have esid */
 	cmpldi	r10,16
 	/* below SLICE_LOW_TOP */
-- 
2.14.3

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/mm/hash: Move the slb_addr_limit check within PPC_MM_SLICES

From: LEROY Christophe <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-30 15:08:12

Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Should not have any impact, because we always select PP_MM_SLICES=20=20
=20these days.
Nevertheless it is good to indicate that slb_addr_limit is available onl=
y
quoted
with slice code.
That file can only be built if PPC_MM_SLICES=3Dy.

So let's just remove the ifdef entirely.

These days PPC_MM_SLICES =3D=3D PPC_BOOK3S_64, so we should remove
PPC_MM_SLICES #defines wherever possible and replace them with
PPC_BOOK3S_64 otherwise IMO.
PPC8xx also selects PPC_MM_SLICES when hugepages is selected.

Christophe
cheers
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
index c66cb06e73a1..337ef162851d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb_low.S
@@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
 	 */
 	cmpdi	r9, 0
 	bne-	8f
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES
         /*
          * user space make sure we are within the allowed limit
 	 */
@@ -183,7 +185,6 @@ END_MMU_FTR_SECTION_IFCLR(MMU_FTR_1T_SEGMENT)
 	 * really do dynamic patching unfortunately as processes might flip
 	 * between 4k and 64k standard page size
 	 */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_MM_SLICES
 	/* r10 have esid */
 	cmpldi	r10,16
 	/* below SLICE_LOW_TOP */
--
2.14.3
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help