[PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Fix call trace due to incorrect preempt count

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE3082d

5 messages, 4 authors, 2018-03-31 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Fix call trace due to incorrect preempt count

From: Naveen N. Rao <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-17 12:22:35

Michael Ellerman reported the following call trace when running
ftracetest:

BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: ftracetest/6178
caller is opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
CPU: 1 PID: 6178 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-gcc6x-gb2cd1df #1
Call Trace:
[c0000000f9ec39c0] [c000000000ac4304] dump_stack+0xb4/0x100 (unreliable)
[c0000000f9ec3a00] [c00000000061159c] check_preemption_disabled+0x15c/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3a90] [c000000000217e84] opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
[c0000000f9ec3af0] [c00000000004cf68] optimized_callback+0x148/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3b40] [c00000000004d954] optinsn_slot+0xec/0x10000
[c0000000f9ec3e30] [c00000000004bae0] kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x10

This is showing up since OPTPROBES is now enabled with CONFIG_PREEMPT.

trampoline_probe_handler() considers itself to be a special kprobe
handler for kretprobes. In doing so, it expects to be called from
kprobe_handler() on a trap, and re-enables preemption before returning a
non-zero return value so as to suppress any subsequent processing of the
trap by the kprobe_handler().

However, with optprobes, we don't deal with special handlers (we ignore
the return code) and just try to re-enable preemption causing the above
trace.

To address this, modify trampoline_probe_handler() to not be special.
The only additional processing done in kprobe_handler() is to emulate
the instruction (in this case, a 'nop'). We adjust the value of
regs->nip for the purpose and delegate the job of re-enabling
preemption and resetting current kprobe to the probe handlers
(kprobe_handler() or optimized_callback()).

Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index ca5d5a081e75..e4c5bf33970b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -455,29 +455,33 @@ static int trampoline_probe_handler(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	}
 
 	kretprobe_assert(ri, orig_ret_address, trampoline_address);
-	regs->nip = orig_ret_address;
+
 	/*
-	 * Make LR point to the orig_ret_address.
-	 * When the 'nop' inside the kretprobe_trampoline
-	 * is optimized, we can do a 'blr' after executing the
-	 * detour buffer code.
+	 * We get here through one of two paths:
+	 * 1. by taking a trap -> kprobe_handler() -> here
+	 * 2. by optprobe branch -> optimized_callback() -> opt_pre_handler() -> here
+	 *
+	 * When going back through (1), we need regs->nip to be setup properly
+	 * as it is used to determine the return address from the trap.
+	 * For (2), since nip is not honoured with optprobes, we instead setup
+	 * the link register properly so that the subsequent 'blr' in
+	 * kretprobe_trampoline jumps back to the right instruction.
+	 *
+	 * For nip, we should set the address to the previous instruction since
+	 * we end up emulating it in kprobe_handler(), which increments the nip
+	 * again.
 	 */
+	regs->nip = orig_ret_address - 4;
 	regs->link = orig_ret_address;
 
-	reset_current_kprobe();
 	kretprobe_hash_unlock(current, &flags);
-	preempt_enable_no_resched();
 
 	hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ri, tmp, &empty_rp, hlist) {
 		hlist_del(&ri->hlist);
 		kfree(ri);
 	}
-	/*
-	 * By returning a non-zero value, we are telling
-	 * kprobe_handler() that we don't want the post_handler
-	 * to run (and have re-enabled preemption)
-	 */
-	return 1;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trampoline_probe_handler);
 
-- 
2.15.1

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Fix call trace due to incorrect preempt count

From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-17 16:48:31

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 05:52:24PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
Michael Ellerman reported the following call trace when running
ftracetest:

BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: ftracetest/6178
caller is opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
CPU: 1 PID: 6178 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-gcc6x-gb2cd1df #1
Call Trace:
[c0000000f9ec39c0] [c000000000ac4304] dump_stack+0xb4/0x100 (unreliable)
[c0000000f9ec3a00] [c00000000061159c] check_preemption_disabled+0x15c/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3a90] [c000000000217e84] opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
[c0000000f9ec3af0] [c00000000004cf68] optimized_callback+0x148/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3b40] [c00000000004d954] optinsn_slot+0xec/0x10000
[c0000000f9ec3e30] [c00000000004bae0] kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x10

This is showing up since OPTPROBES is now enabled with CONFIG_PREEMPT.

trampoline_probe_handler() considers itself to be a special kprobe
handler for kretprobes. In doing so, it expects to be called from
kprobe_handler() on a trap, and re-enables preemption before returning a
non-zero return value so as to suppress any subsequent processing of the
trap by the kprobe_handler().

However, with optprobes, we don't deal with special handlers (we ignore
the return code) and just try to re-enable preemption causing the above
trace.

To address this, modify trampoline_probe_handler() to not be special.
The only additional processing done in kprobe_handler() is to emulate
the instruction (in this case, a 'nop'). We adjust the value of
regs->nip for the purpose and delegate the job of re-enabling
preemption and resetting current kprobe to the probe handlers
(kprobe_handler() or optimized_callback()).

Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <redacted>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <redacted>

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Fix call trace due to incorrect preempt count

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date: 2018-01-19 11:19:48

Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 05:52:24PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
quoted
Michael Ellerman reported the following call trace when running
ftracetest:

BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: ftracetest/6178
caller is opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
CPU: 1 PID: 6178 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-gcc6x-gb2cd1df #1
Call Trace:
[c0000000f9ec39c0] [c000000000ac4304] dump_stack+0xb4/0x100 (unreliable)
[c0000000f9ec3a00] [c00000000061159c] check_preemption_disabled+0x15c/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3a90] [c000000000217e84] opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
[c0000000f9ec3af0] [c00000000004cf68] optimized_callback+0x148/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3b40] [c00000000004d954] optinsn_slot+0xec/0x10000
[c0000000f9ec3e30] [c00000000004bae0] kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x10

This is showing up since OPTPROBES is now enabled with CONFIG_PREEMPT.

trampoline_probe_handler() considers itself to be a special kprobe
handler for kretprobes. In doing so, it expects to be called from
kprobe_handler() on a trap, and re-enables preemption before returning a
non-zero return value so as to suppress any subsequent processing of the
trap by the kprobe_handler().

However, with optprobes, we don't deal with special handlers (we ignore
the return code) and just try to re-enable preemption causing the above
trace.

To address this, modify trampoline_probe_handler() to not be special.
The only additional processing done in kprobe_handler() is to emulate
the instruction (in this case, a 'nop'). We adjust the value of
regs->nip for the purpose and delegate the job of re-enabling
preemption and resetting current kprobe to the probe handlers
(kprobe_handler() or optimized_callback()).

Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <redacted>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <redacted>
Fixes: 51c9c0843993 ("powerpc/kprobes: Implement Optprobes")

??

cheers

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/kprobes: Fix call trace due to incorrect preempt count

From: Naveen N. Rao <hidden>
Date: 2018-01-19 11:37:45

Michael Ellerman wrote:
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [off-list ref] writes:
=20
quoted
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 05:52:24PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
quoted
Michael Ellerman reported the following call trace when running
ftracetest:
=20
BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: ftracetes=
t/6178
quoted
quoted
caller is opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
CPU: 1 PID: 6178 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-gcc6x-gb2cd1df=
 #1
quoted
quoted
Call Trace:
[c0000000f9ec39c0] [c000000000ac4304] dump_stack+0xb4/0x100 (unreliable=
)
quoted
quoted
[c0000000f9ec3a00] [c00000000061159c] check_preemption_disabled+0x15c/0=
x170
quoted
quoted
[c0000000f9ec3a90] [c000000000217e84] opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
[c0000000f9ec3af0] [c00000000004cf68] optimized_callback+0x148/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3b40] [c00000000004d954] optinsn_slot+0xec/0x10000
[c0000000f9ec3e30] [c00000000004bae0] kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x10
=20
This is showing up since OPTPROBES is now enabled with CONFIG_PREEMPT.
=20
trampoline_probe_handler() considers itself to be a special kprobe
handler for kretprobes. In doing so, it expects to be called from
kprobe_handler() on a trap, and re-enables preemption before returning =
a
quoted
quoted
non-zero return value so as to suppress any subsequent processing of th=
e
quoted
quoted
trap by the kprobe_handler().
=20
However, with optprobes, we don't deal with special handlers (we ignore
the return code) and just try to re-enable preemption causing the above
trace.
=20
To address this, modify trampoline_probe_handler() to not be special.
The only additional processing done in kprobe_handler() is to emulate
the instruction (in this case, a 'nop'). We adjust the value of
regs->nip for the purpose and delegate the job of re-enabling
preemption and resetting current kprobe to the probe handlers
(kprobe_handler() or optimized_callback()).
=20
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <redacted>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <redacted>
=20
Fixes: 51c9c0843993 ("powerpc/kprobes: Implement Optprobes")
Fixes: 8a2d71a3f2737e ("powerpc/kprobes: Disable preemption before=20
invoking probe handler for optprobes")

I think this is more appropriate. I should have caught this issue with=20
kretprobes, but I am fairly certain that I ran ftracetest at that point,
but didn't see any call traces.

Regards,
Naveen

=

Re: powerpc/kprobes: Fix call trace due to incorrect preempt count

From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-31 14:03:43

On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 12:22:24 UTC, "Naveen N. Rao" wrote:
Michael Ellerman reported the following call trace when running
ftracetest:

BUG: using __this_cpu_write() in preemptible [00000000] code: ftracetest/6178
caller is opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
CPU: 1 PID: 6178 Comm: ftracetest Not tainted 4.15.0-rc7-gcc6x-gb2cd1df #1
Call Trace:
[c0000000f9ec39c0] [c000000000ac4304] dump_stack+0xb4/0x100 (unreliable)
[c0000000f9ec3a00] [c00000000061159c] check_preemption_disabled+0x15c/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3a90] [c000000000217e84] opt_pre_handler+0xc4/0x110
[c0000000f9ec3af0] [c00000000004cf68] optimized_callback+0x148/0x170
[c0000000f9ec3b40] [c00000000004d954] optinsn_slot+0xec/0x10000
[c0000000f9ec3e30] [c00000000004bae0] kretprobe_trampoline+0x0/0x10

This is showing up since OPTPROBES is now enabled with CONFIG_PREEMPT.

trampoline_probe_handler() considers itself to be a special kprobe
handler for kretprobes. In doing so, it expects to be called from
kprobe_handler() on a trap, and re-enables preemption before returning a
non-zero return value so as to suppress any subsequent processing of the
trap by the kprobe_handler().

However, with optprobes, we don't deal with special handlers (we ignore
the return code) and just try to re-enable preemption causing the above
trace.

To address this, modify trampoline_probe_handler() to not be special.
The only additional processing done in kprobe_handler() is to emulate
the instruction (in this case, a 'nop'). We adjust the value of
regs->nip for the purpose and delegate the job of re-enabling
preemption and resetting current kprobe to the probe handlers
(kprobe_handler() or optimized_callback()).

Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <redacted>
Acked-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <redacted>
Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/e6e133c47e6bd4d5dac05b35d06634

cheers
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help