From: Hari Bathini <hidden> Date: 2017-05-22 09:35:23
With commit 11550dc0a00b ("powerpc/fadump: reuse crashkernel parameter
for fadump memory reservation"), 'fadump_reserve_mem=' parameter is
deprecated in favor of 'crashkernel=' parameter. Add a warning if
'fadump_reserve_mem=' is still used.
Suggested-by: Prarit Bhargava <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
@@ -212,6 +212,10 @@ static inline unsigned long fadump_calculate_reserve_size(void)intret;unsignedlonglongbase,size;+if(fw_dump.reserve_bootvar)+pr_warn("'fadump_reserve_mem=' parameter is deprecated in "+"favor of 'crashkernel=' parameter.\n");+/**Checkifthesizeisspecifiedthroughcrashkernel=cmdline*option.Ifyes,thenusethatbutignorebaseasfadump
@@ -220,8 +224,18 @@ static inline unsigned long fadump_calculate_reserve_size(void)ret=parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line,memblock_phys_mem_size(),&size,&base);if(ret==0&&size>0){+if(fw_dump.reserve_bootvar)+pr_info("Using 'crashkernel=' parameter for"+" memory reservation.\n");+fw_dump.reserve_bootvar=(unsignedlong)size;returnfw_dump.reserve_bootvar;+}elseif(fw_dump.reserve_bootvar){+/*+*'fadump_reserve_mem='isbeingusedtoreservememory+*forfirmware-assisteddump.+*/+returnfw_dump.reserve_bootvar;}/* divide by 20 to get 5% of value */
@@ -377,6 +391,19 @@ static int __init early_fadump_param(char *p)}early_param("fadump",early_fadump_param);+/*+*Lookforfadump_reserve_mem=cmdlineoption+*TODO:Removereferencesto'fadump_reserve_mem='parameter,+*thesooner'crashkernel='parameterisaccustomedto.+*/+staticint__initearly_fadump_reserve_mem(char*p)+{+if(p)+fw_dump.reserve_bootvar=memparse(p,&p);+return0;+}+early_param("fadump_reserve_mem",early_fadump_reserve_mem);+staticvoidregister_fw_dump(structfadump_mem_struct*fdm){intrc;
From: Hari Bathini <hidden> Date: 2017-05-22 09:35:55
With commit f6e6bedb7731 ("powerpc/fadump: Reserve memory at an offset
closer to bottom of RAM"), memory for fadump is no longer reserved at
the top of RAM. But there are still a few places which say so. Change
them appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <redacted>
---
Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ as follows: boot successfully. For syntax of crashkernel= parameter, refer to Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt. If any offset is provided in crashkernel= parameter, it will be ignored- as fadump reserves memory at end of RAM for boot memory- dump preservation in case of a crash.+ as fadump uses a predefined offset to reserve memory+ for boot memory dump preservation in case of a crash. -- After the low memory (boot memory) area has been saved, the firmware will reset PCI and other hardware state. It will
From: Michal Suchánek <hidden> Date: 2017-05-22 10:55:24
On Mon, 22 May 2017 15:04:47 +0530
Hari Bathini [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk
With commit f6e6bedb7731 ("powerpc/fadump: Reserve memory at an offset
closer to bottom of RAM"), memory for fadump is no longer reserved at
the top of RAM. But there are still a few places which say so. Change
them appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <redacted>
---
Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
b/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt index
9cabaf8..bdd344a 100644 ---
a/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt +++
b/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
as follows: boot successfully. For syntax of crashkernel= parameter,
refer to Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt. If any offset is
provided in crashkernel= parameter, it will be ignored
- as fadump reserves memory at end of RAM for boot memory
- dump preservation in case of a crash.
+ as fadump uses a predefined offset to reserve memory
+ for boot memory dump preservation in case of a crash.
What is the reason for fadump to prefer a random offset calculated by
the kernel over a random offset supplied by the user?
Since the random offset calculated by the kernel was recently adjusted
to counter issues with fadump registration maybe it would be reasonable
to allow the user to supply a custom random offset and override the
kernel-calculated random offset if they want to do so.
PS 'random' meaning in no relationship to actual system topology that
would warrant this offset to be in any way better than any other.
Thanks
Michal
From: Hari Bathini <hidden> Date: 2017-05-22 18:57:41
Hi Michal,
Thanks for the review..
On Monday 22 May 2017 04:25 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2017 15:04:47 +0530
Hari Bathini [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
With commit f6e6bedb7731 ("powerpc/fadump: Reserve memory at an offset
closer to bottom of RAM"), memory for fadump is no longer reserved at
the top of RAM. But there are still a few places which say so. Change
them appropriately.
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <redacted>
---
Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt | 4 ++--
arch/powerpc/kernel/fadump.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
b/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt index
9cabaf8..bdd344a 100644 ---
a/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt +++
b/Documentation/powerpc/firmware-assisted-dump.txt @@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
as follows: boot successfully. For syntax of crashkernel= parameter,
refer to Documentation/kdump/kdump.txt. If any offset is
provided in crashkernel= parameter, it will be ignored
- as fadump reserves memory at end of RAM for boot memory
- dump preservation in case of a crash.
+ as fadump uses a predefined offset to reserve memory
+ for boot memory dump preservation in case of a crash.
What is the reason for fadump to prefer a random offset calculated by
the kernel over a random offset supplied by the user?
An offset provided by user needs multiple checks failing which can be
tricky.
While implementation is still possible, it makes the code complicated for no
practical gain as commit f6e6bedb7731 is already calculating the best
possible
offset..
Thanks
Hari
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden> Date: 2017-06-05 10:21:51
On Mon, 2017-05-22 at 09:34:23 UTC, Hari Bathini wrote:
With commit 11550dc0a00b ("powerpc/fadump: reuse crashkernel parameter
for fadump memory reservation"), 'fadump_reserve_mem=' parameter is
deprecated in favor of 'crashkernel=' parameter. Add a warning if
'fadump_reserve_mem=' is still used.
Suggested-by: Prarit Bhargava <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <redacted>