On 2017/02/28 09:11AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:

On Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:04:15 +1100
Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:

kernel/trace/ftrace.c more obvious.

quoted

I don't know if it's really worth keeping the names the same across
arches, especially as we already have:

  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
  arch/arm/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
  arch/blackfin/kernel/ftrace-entry.S
  arch/metag/kernel/ftrace_stub.S

But we can rename it if you feel strongly about it.

Hmm, perhaps "entry-ftrace.S" would be the better name. I never liked
the "mcount.S" name.

Ok, just to be sure I get this right -- do you want me to name the 
powerpc files entry_ftrace_64.S (and subsequently to a slightly long 
entry_ftrace_64_mprofile.S), or rename the x86 mcount* files? Or both?

Thanks for the review,
- Naveen