From: Ian Munsie <hidden> Date: 2016-06-29 12:16:45
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
If the AFU descriptor of an AFU directed AFU indicates that it supports
0 maximum processes, we will accept that value and attempt to use it.
The SPA will still be allocated (with 2 pages due to another minor bug
and room for 958 processes), and when a context is allocated we will
pass the value of 0 to idr_alloc as the maximum. However, idr_alloc will
treat that as meaning no maximum and will allocate a context number and
we return a valid context.
Conceivably, this could lead to a buffer overflow of the SPA if more
than 958 contexts were allocated, however this is mitigated by the fact
that there are no known AFUs in the wild with a bogus AFU descriptor
like this, and that only the root user is allowed to flash an AFU image
to a card.
Add a check when validating the AFU descriptor to reject any with 0
maximum processes.
We do still allow a dedicated process only AFU to indicate that it
supports 0 contexts even though that is forbidden in the architecture,
as in that case we ignore the value and use 1 instead. This is just on
the off-chance that such a dedicated process AFU may exist (not that I
am aware of any), since their developers are less likely to have cared
about this value at all.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
---
drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
@@ -775,6 +775,21 @@ static int cxl_afu_descriptor_looks_ok(struct cxl_afu *afu)}}+if((afu->modes_supported&~CXL_MODE_DEDICATED)&&afu->max_procs_virtualised==0){+/*+*Wecouldalsocheckthisforthededicatedprocessmodel+*sincethearchitectureindicatesitshouldbesetto1,but+*inthatcaseweignorethevalueandI'drathernotrisk+*breakinganyexistingdedicatedprocessAFUsthatleftitas+*0(notthatI'mawareofany).Itisclearlyanerrorforan+*AFUdirectedAFUtosetthisto0,andwouldhavepreviously+*triggeredabugresultinginthemaximumnotbeingenforced+*atallsinceidr_alloctreats0asnomaximum.+*/+dev_err(&afu->dev,"AFU does not support any processes\n");+return-EINVAL;+}+return0;}
From: Ian Munsie <hidden> Date: 2016-06-29 12:17:19
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
The Scheduled Process Area is allocated dynamically with enough pages to
fit at least as many processes as the AFU descriptor indicated. Since
the calculation is non-trivial, it does this by calculating how many
processes could fit in an allocation of a given order, and increasing
that order until it can fit enough processes or hits the maximum
supported size.
Currently, it will start this search using a SPA of 2 pages instead of
1. This can waste a page of memory if the AFU's maximum number of
supported processes was small enough to fit in one page.
Fix the algorithm to start the search at 1 page.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
---
drivers/misc/cxl/native.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int cxl_alloc_spa(struct cxl_afu *afu)unsignedspa_size;/* Work out how many pages to allocate */-afu->native->spa_order=0;+afu->native->spa_order=-1;do{afu->native->spa_order++;spa_size=(1<<afu->native->spa_order)*PAGE_SIZE;
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
If the AFU descriptor of an AFU directed AFU indicates that it supports
0 maximum processes, we will accept that value and attempt to use it.
The SPA will still be allocated (with 2 pages due to another minor bug
and room for 958 processes), and when a context is allocated we will
pass the value of 0 to idr_alloc as the maximum. However, idr_alloc will
treat that as meaning no maximum and will allocate a context number and
we return a valid context.
Conceivably, this could lead to a buffer overflow of the SPA if more
than 958 contexts were allocated, however this is mitigated by the fact
that there are no known AFUs in the wild with a bogus AFU descriptor
like this, and that only the root user is allowed to flash an AFU image
to a card.
Add a check when validating the AFU descriptor to reject any with 0
maximum processes.
We do still allow a dedicated process only AFU to indicate that it
supports 0 contexts even though that is forbidden in the architecture,
as in that case we ignore the value and use 1 instead. This is just on
the off-chance that such a dedicated process AFU may exist (not that I
am aware of any), since their developers are less likely to have cared
about this value at all.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
The Scheduled Process Area is allocated dynamically with enough pages to
fit at least as many processes as the AFU descriptor indicated. Since
the calculation is non-trivial, it does this by calculating how many
processes could fit in an allocation of a given order, and increasing
that order until it can fit enough processes or hits the maximum
supported size.
Currently, it will start this search using a SPA of 2 pages instead of
1. This can waste a page of memory if the AFU's maximum number of
supported processes was small enough to fit in one page.
Fix the algorithm to start the search at 1 page.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
From: Andrew Donnellan <hidden> Date: 2016-06-29 22:35:54
On 29/06/16 22:16, Ian Munsie wrote:
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
If the AFU descriptor of an AFU directed AFU indicates that it supports
0 maximum processes, we will accept that value and attempt to use it.
The SPA will still be allocated (with 2 pages due to another minor bug
and room for 958 processes), and when a context is allocated we will
pass the value of 0 to idr_alloc as the maximum. However, idr_alloc will
treat that as meaning no maximum and will allocate a context number and
we return a valid context.
Conceivably, this could lead to a buffer overflow of the SPA if more
than 958 contexts were allocated, however this is mitigated by the fact
that there are no known AFUs in the wild with a bogus AFU descriptor
like this, and that only the root user is allowed to flash an AFU image
to a card.
Add a check when validating the AFU descriptor to reject any with 0
maximum processes.
We do still allow a dedicated process only AFU to indicate that it
supports 0 contexts even though that is forbidden in the architecture,
as in that case we ignore the value and use 1 instead. This is just on
the off-chance that such a dedicated process AFU may exist (not that I
am aware of any), since their developers are less likely to have cared
about this value at all.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
From: Andrew Donnellan <hidden> Date: 2016-06-29 23:07:32
On 29/06/16 22:16, Ian Munsie wrote:
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
The Scheduled Process Area is allocated dynamically with enough pages to
fit at least as many processes as the AFU descriptor indicated. Since
the calculation is non-trivial, it does this by calculating how many
processes could fit in an allocation of a given order, and increasing
that order until it can fit enough processes or hits the maximum
supported size.
Currently, it will start this search using a SPA of 2 pages instead of
1. This can waste a page of memory if the AFU's maximum number of
supported processes was small enough to fit in one page.
Fix the algorithm to start the search at 1 page.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnellan@au1.ibm.com IBM Australia Limited
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Date: 2016-07-11 10:19:20
On Wed, 2016-29-06 at 12:16:25 UTC, Ian Munsie wrote:
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
If the AFU descriptor of an AFU directed AFU indicates that it supports
0 maximum processes, we will accept that value and attempt to use it.
The SPA will still be allocated (with 2 pages due to another minor bug
and room for 958 processes), and when a context is allocated we will
pass the value of 0 to idr_alloc as the maximum. However, idr_alloc will
treat that as meaning no maximum and will allocate a context number and
we return a valid context.
Conceivably, this could lead to a buffer overflow of the SPA if more
than 958 contexts were allocated, however this is mitigated by the fact
that there are no known AFUs in the wild with a bogus AFU descriptor
like this, and that only the root user is allowed to flash an AFU image
to a card.
Add a check when validating the AFU descriptor to reject any with 0
maximum processes.
We do still allow a dedicated process only AFU to indicate that it
supports 0 contexts even though that is forbidden in the architecture,
as in that case we ignore the value and use 1 instead. This is just on
the off-chance that such a dedicated process AFU may exist (not that I
am aware of any), since their developers are less likely to have cared
about this value at all.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Date: 2016-07-11 10:19:22
On Wed, 2016-29-06 at 12:16:26 UTC, Ian Munsie wrote:
From: Ian Munsie <redacted>
The Scheduled Process Area is allocated dynamically with enough pages to
fit at least as many processes as the AFU descriptor indicated. Since
the calculation is non-trivial, it does this by calculating how many
processes could fit in an allocation of a given order, and increasing
that order until it can fit enough processes or hits the maximum
supported size.
Currently, it will start this search using a SPA of 2 pages instead of
1. This can waste a page of memory if the AFU's maximum number of
supported processes was small enough to fit in one page.
Fix the algorithm to start the search at 1 page.
Signed-off-by: Ian Munsie <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <redacted>