From: Alessio Igor Bogani <hidden> Date: 2016-01-27 09:24:59
Hi Kumar,
I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
86xx base systems (gef_ppc9a_defconfig, gef_sbc310_defconfig,
gef_sbc610_defconfig, mpc8610_hpcd_defconfig, mpc8641_hpcn_defconfig
and sbc8641d_defconfig) into the
mpc86xx_defconfig/mpc86xx_smp_defconfig as like already done for 85xx
ones.
Thank you very much!
Ciao,
Alessio
From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> Date: 2016-01-27 14:25:32
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Hi Kumar,
I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
86xx base systems (gef_ppc9a_defconfig, gef_sbc310_defconfig,
gef_sbc610_defconfig, mpc8610_hpcd_defconfig, mpc8641_hpcn_defconfig
and sbc8641d_defconfig) into the
mpc86xx_defconfig/mpc86xx_smp_defconfig as like already done for 85xx
ones.
Thank you very much!
From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> Date: 2016-01-27 14:27:06
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
quoted
Hi Kumar,
I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
86xx base systems (gef_ppc9a_defconfig, gef_sbc310_defconfig,
gef_sbc610_defconfig, mpc8610_hpcd_defconfig, mpc8641_hpcn_defconfig
and sbc8641d_defconfig) into the
mpc86xx_defconfig/mpc86xx_smp_defconfig as like already done for 85xx
ones.
Thank you very much!
Yes, that would be good.
Also consider using config fragments like 85xx now does (and sharing fragments
with 85xx where appropriate).
-Scott
From: Alessio Igor Bogani <hidden> Date: 2016-02-04 14:26:09
Scott,
On 27 January 2016 at 15:41, Alessio Igor Bogani
[off-list ref] wrote:
Scott,
On 27 January 2016 at 15:27, Scott Wood [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of the
86xx base systems
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
mpc86xx_defconfig/mpc86xx_smp_defconfig as like already done for 85xx
ones.
Yes, that would be good.
There are 6 boards into arch/powerpc/configs/86xx directory. Five of
them are based on dual core 8641 whereas one is based on single core
8610. How should I proceed? Use a single file (mpc86xx_defconfig) or
use two files (mpc86xx_defconfig and mpc86xx_smp_defconfig)?
Thanks a lot!
Ciao,
Alessio
From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> Date: 2016-02-05 20:42:41
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 15:26 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
Scott,
On 27 January 2016 at 15:41, Alessio Igor Bogani
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Scott,
On 27 January 2016 at 15:27, Scott Wood [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 08:25 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
On Wed, 2016-01-27 at 10:24 +0100, Alessio Igor Bogani wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
I'm wondering if we are allowed to put together configurations of
the
86xx base systems
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
mpc86xx_defconfig/mpc86xx_smp_defconfig as like already done for
85xx
ones.
Yes, that would be good.
There are 6 boards into arch/powerpc/configs/86xx directory. Five of
them are based on dual core 8641 whereas one is based on single core
8610. How should I proceed? Use a single file (mpc86xx_defconfig) or
use two files (mpc86xx_defconfig and mpc86xx_smp_defconfig)?
Use a fragment to enable SMP, like 85xx does.
-Scott