On 2015-10-01 08:14, Michael Ellerman wrote:

On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 22:46 +0200, Michal Marek wrote:

quoted

Dne 24.9.2015 v 00:16 Michael Ellerman napsal(a):

quoted

On 23 September 2015 19:50:52 GMT+10:00, Michal Marek
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 2015-09-23 07:40, Michael Ellerman wrote:

quoted

+else ifneq ($(wildcard

arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)),)

quoted

@$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on

'$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'"

quoted

$(Q)$< $(silent)

--defconfig=arch/$(SRCARCH)/configs/$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) $(Kconfig)

quoted

+else +	@$(kecho) "*** Default configuration is based on target

'$(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG)'"

quoted

+	$(Q)$(MAKE) -f $(srctree)/Makefile $(KBUILD_DEFCONFIG) endif

What is the anticipated usage of this? The patch is not needed to
make

make ppc64le_defconfig

work with the second patch. If it was, this would create a loop
anyway.

The idea is to make 'make defconfig' work when KBUILD_DEFCONFIG is
ppc64le_defconfig (which happens for us when uname returns ppc64le)
and additionally when ppc64le_defconfig is not a real file.

Ah, that makes sense. You can add

Acked-by: Michal Marek <redacted>

if you want.

Thanks. I'll assume by that you mean you're happy if I take both patches
through the powerpc tree.

Yes, I assumed that this was your plan.

Michal