[PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE3953d

9 messages, 4 authors, 2015-10-19 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-21 15:48:13

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

This patch removes the redundant mpic_irq_set_wake and sets the
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for only FSL MPIC.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Scott Wood <redacted>
Cc: Hongtao Jia <redacted>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 23 ++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
index 537e5db85a06..123e43612f0a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c

@@ -924,22 +924,6 @@ int mpic_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)
 	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY;
 }
 
-static int mpic_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
-{
-	struct irq_desc *desc = container_of(d, struct irq_desc, irq_data);
-	struct mpic *mpic = mpic_from_irq_data(d);
-
-	if (!(mpic->flags & MPIC_FSL))
-		return -ENXIO;
-
-	if (on)
-		desc->action->flags |= IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
-	else
-		desc->action->flags &= ~IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
 void mpic_set_vector(unsigned int virq, unsigned int vector)
 {
 	struct mpic *mpic = mpic_from_irq(virq);

@@ -977,7 +961,6 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_chip = {
 	.irq_unmask	= mpic_unmask_irq,
 	.irq_eoi	= mpic_end_irq,
 	.irq_set_type	= mpic_set_irq_type,
-	.irq_set_wake	= mpic_irq_set_wake,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP

@@ -992,7 +975,6 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_tm_chip = {
 	.irq_mask	= mpic_mask_tm,
 	.irq_unmask	= mpic_unmask_tm,
 	.irq_eoi	= mpic_end_irq,
-	.irq_set_wake	= mpic_irq_set_wake,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MPIC_U3_HT_IRQS

@@ -1283,8 +1265,11 @@ struct mpic * __init mpic_alloc(struct device_node *node,
 		flags |= MPIC_NO_RESET;
 	if (of_get_property(node, "single-cpu-affinity", NULL))
 		flags |= MPIC_SINGLE_DEST_CPU;
-	if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,mpic"))
+	if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,mpic")) {
 		flags |= MPIC_FSL | MPIC_LARGE_VECTORS;
+		mpic_irq_chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
+		mpic_tm_chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
+	}
 
 	mpic = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mpic), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (mpic == NULL)

-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-22 23:50:23

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted hunk

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

This patch removes the redundant mpic_irq_set_wake and sets the
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for only FSL MPIC.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Scott Wood <redacted>
Cc: Hongtao Jia <redacted>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 23 ++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
index 537e5db85a06..123e43612f0a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c

@@ -924,22 +924,6 @@ int mpic_set_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int

flow_type)
      return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_NOCOPY;
 }
 
-static int mpic_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
-{
-     struct irq_desc *desc = container_of(d, struct irq_desc, irq_data);
-     struct mpic *mpic = mpic_from_irq_data(d);
-
-     if (!(mpic->flags & MPIC_FSL))
-             return -ENXIO;
-
-     if (on)
-             desc->action->flags |= IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
-     else
-             desc->action->flags &= ~IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
-
-     return 0;
-}
-
 void mpic_set_vector(unsigned int virq, unsigned int vector)
 {
      struct mpic *mpic = mpic_from_irq(virq);

@@ -977,7 +961,6 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_irq_chip = {
      .irq_unmask     = mpic_unmask_irq,
      .irq_eoi        = mpic_end_irq,
      .irq_set_type   = mpic_set_irq_type,
-     .irq_set_wake   = mpic_irq_set_wake,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -992,7 +975,6 @@ static struct irq_chip mpic_tm_chip = {
      .irq_mask       = mpic_mask_tm,
      .irq_unmask     = mpic_unmask_tm,
      .irq_eoi        = mpic_end_irq,
-     .irq_set_wake   = mpic_irq_set_wake,
 };
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MPIC_U3_HT_IRQS
@@ -1283,8 +1265,11 @@ struct mpic * __init mpic_alloc(struct device_node 

*node,
              flags |= MPIC_NO_RESET;
      if (of_get_property(node, "single-cpu-affinity", NULL))
              flags |= MPIC_SINGLE_DEST_CPU;
-     if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,mpic"))
+     if (of_device_is_compatible(node, "fsl,mpic")) {
              flags |= MPIC_FSL | MPIC_LARGE_VECTORS;
+             mpic_irq_chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
+             mpic_tm_chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE;
+     }

What difference does IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE make in the absence of an 
.irq_set_wake() callback?

This is basically repealing commit 5ff04b7287d87c1db7 ("powerpc/mpic: add 
irq_set_wake support").  Wang Dongsheng, can you explain why that patch was 
needed?

-Scott

RE: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Wang Dongsheng <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-23 02:35:56
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RE: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-23 03:49:53

On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Wang Dongsheng wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

Non-freescale return -ENXIO, is there any issue? If non-freescale
platform does not support it, but IPs still use
enable/disable_irq_wake, we should return a error number.

You can just set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for FSL chips and not for the
others.

@Scott:
If set this flag we cannot keep a irq as a wakeup source when system going to
SUSPEND or MEM.

irq_set_wake() means we can set this irq as a wake source.
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE is ignore irq_set_wake() feature.

Nonsense. IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE merily tells the core not to bail on
!chip->irq_set_wake(), but its still marking the interrupt as wakeup
source and therefor not masking it on suspend.

IRQF_NO_SUSPEND is the wrong tool. End of story.

Thanks,

	tglx

Re: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-23 04:06:24

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

This patch removes the redundant mpic_irq_set_wake and sets the
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for only FSL MPIC.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Scott Wood <redacted>
Cc: Hongtao Jia <redacted>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 23 ++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Scott Wood <redacted>

-Scott

RE: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Wang Dongsheng <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-23 05:31:09

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Gleixner
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 11:49 AM
To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Sudeep Holla; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; Rafael J. Wysocki; Benjamin Herrenschmidt; Paul
Mackerras; Michael Ellerman; Jia Hongtao-B38951; Marc Zyngier; linuxppc-
dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE inste=

ad of

redundant mpic_irq_set_wake
=20
On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Wang Dongsheng wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_S=

USPEND

quoted

flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_se=

t_wak

quoted

is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND=

 flag

quoted

as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

Non-freescale return -ENXIO, is there any issue? If non-freescale
platform does not support it, but IPs still use
enable/disable_irq_wake, we should return a error number.

=20
You can just set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for FSL chips and not for the
others.
=20

quoted

@Scott:
If set this flag we cannot keep a irq as a wakeup source when system go=

ing to

quoted

SUSPEND or MEM.

irq_set_wake() means we can set this irq as a wake source.
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE is ignore irq_set_wake() feature.

=20
Nonsense. IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE merily tells the core not to bail on
!chip->irq_set_wake(), but its still marking the interrupt as wakeup
source and therefor not masking it on suspend.
=20

Sorry, I just check irq_set_irq_wake() code, right, IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE a=
lso can
going to irqd_set to mask IRQD_WAKEUP_STATE.

Yes, this flag just skip the irq_set_wake() not this feature.

Regards,
-Dongsheng

RE: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2015-09-23 08:01:10

On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Wang Dongsheng wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Gleixner
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 11:49 AM
To: Wang Dongsheng-B40534
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; Sudeep Holla; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
kernel@vger.kernel.org; Rafael J. Wysocki; Benjamin Herrenschmidt; Paul
Mackerras; Michael Ellerman; Jia Hongtao-B38951; Marc Zyngier; linuxppc-
dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of
redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

Can you please fix you mail client to get rid of that silly copy of
the mail header?

quoted

On Wed, 23 Sep 2015, Wang Dongsheng wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

Non-freescale return -ENXIO, is there any issue? If non-freescale
platform does not support it, but IPs still use
enable/disable_irq_wake, we should return a error number.

You can just set IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for FSL chips and not for the
others.

quoted

@Scott:
If set this flag we cannot keep a irq as a wakeup source when system going to
SUSPEND or MEM.

irq_set_wake() means we can set this irq as a wake source.
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE is ignore irq_set_wake() feature.

Nonsense. IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE merily tells the core not to bail on
!chip->irq_set_wake(), but its still marking the interrupt as wakeup
source and therefor not masking it on suspend.

Sorry, I just check irq_set_irq_wake() code, right, IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE also can
going to irqd_set to mask IRQD_WAKEUP_STATE.

Yes, this flag just skip the irq_set_wake() not this feature.

And just for completeness. That commit 5ff04b7287d87c 'powerpc/mpic:
add irq_set_wake support' is another example of trainwreck engineering.

    desc->action->flags |= IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;

This is not only horribly avoiding any of the existing APIs, it's also
broken as hell. desc->action can be NULL when that is called.

It seems fleascale is hell bent to fiddle with the guts of the core
code mindlessly. See commit c866cda47f2c

Yours grumpy

      tglx

Re: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Sudeep Holla <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 17:35:48

Hi Ben,

On 23/09/15 05:06, Scott Wood wrote:

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

This patch removes the redundant mpic_irq_set_wake and sets the
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for only FSL MPIC.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Scott Wood <redacted>
Cc: Hongtao Jia <redacted>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
  arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 23 ++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Scott Wood <redacted>

Can you pick this up via your tree ?

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

Re: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of redundant mpic_irq_set_wake

From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2015-10-19 17:46:24

On Mon, 2015-10-19 at 18:35 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

Hi Ben,

On 23/09/15 05:06, Scott Wood wrote:

quoted

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:

quoted

mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets 
IRQF_NO_SUSPEND
flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak
is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt.

This patch removes the redundant mpic_irq_set_wake and sets the
IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE for only FSL MPIC.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Scott Wood <redacted>
Cc: Hongtao Jia <redacted>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <redacted>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <redacted>
---
  arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 23 ++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Scott Wood <redacted>

Can you pick this up via your tree ?

OK.

-Scott

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help