# Re: \[PATCH V4 2/6\] mm: mlock: Add new mlock, munlock, and munlockall system calls

- From: Eric B Munson \<hidden\>
- Date: 2015-07-24 15:53:22 
- List: linuxppc-dev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2015/07/4542560
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-m68k/2015/07/4540043/t.md

```text
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Guenter Roeck wrote:

> On 07/24/2015 07:39 AM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:15:01AM -0400, Eric B Munson wrote:
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>You haven't wired it up properly on powerpc, but I haven't mentioned it because
> >>>>I'd rather we did it.
> >>>>
> >>>>cheers
> >>>
> >>>It looks like I will be spinning a V5, so I will drop all but the x86
> >>>system calls additions in that version.
> >>
> >>The MIPS bits are looking good however, so
> >>
> >>Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <redacted>
> >>
> >>With my ack, will you keep them or maybe carry them as a separate patch?
> >
> >I will keep the MIPS additions as a separate patch in the series, though
> >I have dropped two of the new syscalls after some discussion.  So I will
> >not include your ack on the new patch.
> >
> >Eric
> >
> 
> Hi Eric,
> 
> next-20150724 still has some failures due to this patch set. Are those
> being looked at (I know parisc builds fail, but there may be others) ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Guenter

Guenter,

Yes, the next respin will drop all new arch syscall entries except
x86[_64] and MIPS.  I will leave it up to arch maintainers to add the
entries.

Eric
```

## Attachments

- [signature.asc](https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2015/07/4542560/attachment/0) (application/pgp-signature, 819 bytes)