[PATCH] rtc/rtc-opal: Enable alarms only when opal supports tpo

rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
timed-power-on(tpo). However some Power platforms like BML use a fake
rtc clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the
missing 'has-tpo' property in the device tree.

Current implementation however enables callback for
rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.

This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
callback pointers only when tpo is supported.

Acked-by: Michael Neuling <redacted>
Acked-by: Neelesh Gupta <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <redacted>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
index 7061dca..1125641 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c

@@ -190,11 +190,9 @@ exit:
 	return rc;
 }
 
-static const struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
+static struct rtc_class_ops opal_rtc_ops = {
 	.read_time	= opal_get_rtc_time,
 	.set_time	= opal_set_rtc_time,
-	.read_alarm	= opal_get_tpo_time,
-	.set_alarm	= opal_set_tpo_time,
 };
 
 static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

@@ -202,8 +200,11 @@ static int opal_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct rtc_device *rtc;
 
 	if (pdev->dev.of_node && of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "has-tpo",
-						 NULL))
+						 NULL)) {
 		device_set_wakeup_capable(&pdev->dev, true);
+		opal_rtc_ops.read_alarm	= opal_get_tpo_time;
+		opal_rtc_ops.set_alarm = opal_set_tpo_time;
+	}
 
 	rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, DRVNAME, &opal_rtc_ops,
 				       THIS_MODULE);

-- 
2.2.1

Vaibhav Jain [off-list ref] writes:

rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
timed-power-on(tpo). However some Power platforms like BML use a fake
rtc clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the
missing 'has-tpo' property in the device tree.

Current implementation however enables callback for
rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.

This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
callback pointers only when tpo is supported.

Acked-by: Michael Neuling <redacted>
Acked-by: Neelesh Gupta <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <redacted>

Acked-by: Stewart Smith <redacted>

FWIW I'm updating OPAL docs with this. The TPO calls aren't actually
documented :(

In future, it'd be great if there was an accompanying skiboot patch
updating the documentation there too.

On 14/07/2015 at 13:28:28 +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote :

rtc-opal driver provides support for rtc alarms via
timed-power-on(tpo). However some Power platforms like BML use a fake
rtc clock and don't support tpo. Such platforms are indicated by the
missing 'has-tpo' property in the device tree.

Current implementation however enables callback for
rtc_class_ops.read/set alarm irrespective of the tpo support from the
platform. This results in a failed opal call when kernel tries to read
an existing alarms via opal_get_tpo_time during rtc device registration.

This patch fixes this issue by setting opal_rtc_ops.read/set_alarm
callback pointers only when tpo is supported.

Acked-by: Michael Neuling <redacted>
Acked-by: Neelesh Gupta <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <redacted>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com