4 messages, 2 authors, 2014-06-10 · open the first message on its own page
From: Tony <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-09 11:43:53
How's the fsl,qman-channel-id value different for different targets ? Is there any document on how this value is achieved ? Or can it be any value ??? Alan.
From: Emil Medve <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-09 15:10:22
Hello Tony, On 06/09/2014 06:43 AM, Tony wrote:
How's the fsl,qman-channel-id value different for different targets ?
Channel ids are assigned in hardware
Is there any document on how this value is achieved ?
They are described in the RM of each SoC and in the DPAA RM
Or can it be any value ???
Nope. It must be the right value or frames will end up in the wrong portal or worse Cheers,
From: Tony <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-09 15:28:24
Thank Emil. Where can i find the details about a 'diff' of qman revisions ? The code i ported doesnt support latest qman revision (REV3). Can i still work on qman REV1.1 for all the latest targets ? (read t-series) Regards On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Emil Medve [off-list ref] wrote:
Hello Tony, On 06/09/2014 06:43 AM, Tony wrote:quoted
How's the fsl,qman-channel-id value different for different targets ?Channel ids are assigned in hardwarequoted
Is there any document on how this value is achieved ?They are described in the RM of each SoC and in the DPAA RMquoted
Or can it be any value ???Nope. It must be the right value or frames will end up in the wrong portal or worse Cheers,
From: Emil Medve <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-10 13:26:30
Hello Tony, On 06/09/2014 10:28 AM, Tony wrote:
Thank Emil. Where can i find the details about a 'diff' of qman revisions ?
Let me look if someody bothered to write an AN about this
The code i ported doesnt support latest qman revision (REV3).
Ported from what (I suspect) SDK release? v1.5 should already have support for the latest xMan revision(s)
Can i still work on qman REV1.1 for all the latest targets ? (read t-series)
I'm inclined to say yes (of course the new features will not be available), but I need to have a look at the code to see with what limitations Cheers,
Regards
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Emil Medve <Emilian.Medve@freescale.com
<mailto:Emilian.Medve@freescale.com>> wrote:
Hello Tony,
On 06/09/2014 06:43 AM, Tony wrote:
> How's the fsl,qman-channel-id value different for different targets ?
Channel ids are assigned in hardware
> Is there any document on how this value is achieved ?
They are described in the RM of each SoC and in the DPAA RM
> Or can it be any value ???
Nope. It must be the right value or frames will end up in the wrong
portal or worse
Cheers,
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev