[PATCH RFC v7 2/6] dma: mpc512x: add support for peripheral transfers

Subsystems: dma generic offload engine subsystem, the rest

STALE4580d

3 messages, 3 authors, 2014-02-19 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH RFC v7 2/6] dma: mpc512x: add support for peripheral transfers

From: Alexander Popov <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-12 13:25:04

Introduce support for slave s/g transfer preparation and the associated
device control callback in the MPC512x DMA controller driver, which adds
support for data transfers between memory and peripheral I/O to the
previously supported mem-to-mem transfers.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Popov <redacted>
---
 drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c | 230 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 225 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c b/drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c
index 2ce248b..b978ef1 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
  * Copyright (C) Freescale Semicondutor, Inc. 2007, 2008.
  * Copyright (C) Semihalf 2009
  * Copyright (C) Ilya Yanok, Emcraft Systems 2010
+ * Copyright (C) Alexander Popov, Promcontroller 2013
  *
  * Written by Piotr Ziecik <kosmo@semihalf.com>. Hardware description
  * (defines, structures and comments) was taken from MPC5121 DMA driver
@@ -29,8 +30,15 @@
  */
 
 /*
- * This is initial version of MPC5121 DMA driver. Only memory to memory
- * transfers are supported (tested using dmatest module).
+ * MPC512x and MPC8308 DMA driver. It supports
+ * memory to memory data transfers (tested using dmatest module) and
+ * data transfers between memory and peripheral I/O memory
+ * by means of slave s/g with these limitations:
+ * - chunked transfers (transfers with more than one part) are refused
+ * as long as proper support for scatter/gather is missing;
+ * - transfers on MPC8308 always start from software as this SoC appears
+ * not to have external request lines for peripheral flow control;
+ * - minimal memory <-> I/O memory transfer size is 4 bytes.
  */
 
 #include <linux/module.h>
@@ -189,6 +197,7 @@ struct mpc_dma_desc {
 	dma_addr_t			tcd_paddr;
 	int				error;
 	struct list_head		node;
+	int				will_access_peripheral;
 };
 
 struct mpc_dma_chan {
@@ -201,6 +210,10 @@ struct mpc_dma_chan {
 	struct mpc_dma_tcd		*tcd;
 	dma_addr_t			tcd_paddr;
 
+	/* Settings for access to peripheral FIFO */
+	dma_addr_t			per_paddr;	/* FIFO address */
+	u32				tcd_nunits;
+
 	/* Lock for this structure */
 	spinlock_t			lock;
 };
@@ -251,8 +264,21 @@ static void mpc_dma_execute(struct mpc_dma_chan *mchan)
 	struct mpc_dma_desc *mdesc;
 	int cid = mchan->chan.chan_id;
 
-	/* Move all queued descriptors to active list */
-	list_splice_tail_init(&mchan->queued, &mchan->active);
+	while (!list_empty(&mchan->queued)) {
+		mdesc = list_first_entry(&mchan->queued,
+						struct mpc_dma_desc, node);
+
+		/* Grab either several mem-to-mem transfer descriptors
+		 * or one peripheral transfer descriptor,
+		 * don't mix mem-to-mem and peripheral transfer descriptors
+		 * within the same 'active' list. */
+		if (mdesc->will_access_peripheral) {
+			if (list_empty(&mchan->active))
+				list_move_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->active);
+			break;
+		} else
+			list_move_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->active);
+	}
 
 	/* Chain descriptors into one transaction */
 	list_for_each_entry(mdesc, &mchan->active, node) {
@@ -278,7 +304,17 @@ static void mpc_dma_execute(struct mpc_dma_chan *mchan)
 
 	if (first != prev)
 		mdma->tcd[cid].e_sg = 1;
-	out_8(&mdma->regs->dmassrt, cid);
+
+	if (mdma->is_mpc8308) {
+		/* MPC8308, no request lines, software initiated start */
+		out_8(&mdma->regs->dmassrt, cid);
+	} else if (first->will_access_peripheral) {
+		/* peripherals involved, start by external request signal */
+		out_8(&mdma->regs->dmaserq, cid);
+	} else {
+		/* memory to memory transfer, software initiated start */
+		out_8(&mdma->regs->dmassrt, cid);
+	}
 }
 
 /* Handle interrupt on one half of DMA controller (32 channels) */
@@ -596,6 +632,7 @@ mpc_dma_prep_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst, dma_addr_t src,
 	}
 
 	mdesc->error = 0;
+	mdesc->will_access_peripheral = 0;
 	tcd = mdesc->tcd;
 
 	/* Prepare Transfer Control Descriptor for this transaction */
@@ -643,6 +680,186 @@ mpc_dma_prep_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst, dma_addr_t src,
 	return &mdesc->desc;
 }
 
+static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
+mpc_dma_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
+		unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
+		unsigned long flags, void *context)
+{
+	struct mpc_dma *mdma = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma(chan);
+	struct mpc_dma_chan *mchan = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma_chan(chan);
+	struct mpc_dma_desc *mdesc = NULL;
+	dma_addr_t per_paddr;
+	u32 tcd_nunits;
+	struct mpc_dma_tcd *tcd;
+	unsigned long iflags;
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
+	size_t len;
+	int iter, i;
+
+	/* currently there is no proper support for scatter/gather */
+	if (sg_len != 1)
+		return NULL;
+
+	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, sg_len, i) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+
+		mdesc = list_first_entry(&mchan->free, struct mpc_dma_desc,
+									node);
+		if (!mdesc) {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+			/* try to free completed descriptors */
+			mpc_dma_process_completed(mdma);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
+		list_del(&mdesc->node);
+
+		per_paddr = mchan->per_paddr;
+		tcd_nunits = mchan->tcd_nunits;
+
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+
+		if (per_paddr == 0 || tcd_nunits == 0)
+			goto err_prep;
+
+		mdesc->error = 0;
+		mdesc->will_access_peripheral = 1;
+		tcd = mdesc->tcd;
+
+		/* Prepare Transfer Control Descriptor for this transaction */
+
+		memset(tcd, 0, sizeof(struct mpc_dma_tcd));
+
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(sg_dma_address(sg), 4))
+			goto err_prep;
+
+		if (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
+			tcd->saddr = per_paddr;
+			tcd->daddr = sg_dma_address(sg);
+			tcd->soff = 0;
+			tcd->doff = 4;
+		} else if (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) {
+			tcd->saddr = sg_dma_address(sg);
+			tcd->daddr = per_paddr;
+			tcd->soff = 4;
+			tcd->doff = 0;
+		} else
+			goto err_prep;
+
+		tcd->ssize = MPC_DMA_TSIZE_4;
+		tcd->dsize = MPC_DMA_TSIZE_4;
+
+		len = sg_dma_len(sg);
+		tcd->nbytes = tcd_nunits * 4;
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(len, tcd->nbytes))
+			goto err_prep;
+
+		iter = len / tcd->nbytes;
+		if (iter >= 1 << 15) {
+			/* len is too big */
+			goto err_prep;
+		} else {
+			/* citer_linkch contains the high bits of iter */
+			tcd->biter = iter & 0x1ff;
+			tcd->biter_linkch = iter >> 9;
+			tcd->citer = tcd->biter;
+			tcd->citer_linkch = tcd->biter_linkch;
+		}
+
+		tcd->e_sg = 0;
+		tcd->d_req = 1;
+
+		/* Place descriptor in prepared list */
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+		list_add_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->prepared);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+	}
+
+	return &mdesc->desc;
+
+err_prep:
+	/* Put the descriptor back */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+	list_add_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->free);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static int mpc_dma_device_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
+							unsigned long arg)
+{
+	struct mpc_dma_chan *mchan;
+	struct mpc_dma *mdma;
+	struct dma_slave_config *cfg;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	mchan = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma_chan(chan);
+	switch (cmd) {
+	case DMA_TERMINATE_ALL:
+		/* disable channel requests */
+		mdma = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma(chan);
+
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, flags);
+
+		out_8(&mdma->regs->dmacerq, chan->chan_id);
+		list_splice_tail_init(&mchan->prepared, &mchan->free);
+		list_splice_tail_init(&mchan->queued, &mchan->free);
+		list_splice_tail_init(&mchan->active, &mchan->free);
+
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, flags);
+
+		return 0;
+	case DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG:
+		/* Constraints:
+		 * - only transfers between a peripheral device and
+		 * memory are supported;
+		 * - minimal transfer size is 4 bytes and consequently
+		 * source and destination addresses must be 4-byte aligned and
+		 * transfer size must be aligned on (4 * maxburst) boundary;
+		 * - RAM address is being incremented by minimal transfer size
+		 * during the transfer;
+		 * - peripheral port's address is constant during the transfer.
+		 */
+
+		cfg = (void *)arg;
+
+		if (cfg->direction != DMA_DEV_TO_MEM &&
+			cfg->direction != DMA_MEM_TO_DEV)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		if (cfg->src_addr_width != DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES &&
+			cfg->dst_addr_width != DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES)
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, flags);
+
+		if (cfg->direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
+			mchan->per_paddr = cfg->src_addr;
+			mchan->tcd_nunits = cfg->src_maxburst;
+		} else {
+			mchan->per_paddr = cfg->dst_addr;
+			mchan->tcd_nunits = cfg->dst_maxburst;
+		}
+
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(mchan->per_paddr, 4)) {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, flags);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		if (mchan->tcd_nunits == 0)
+			mchan->tcd_nunits = 1;	/* apply default */
+
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, flags);
+
+		return 0;
+	default:
+		return -ENOSYS;
+	}
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
+
 static int mpc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 {
 	struct device_node *dn = op->dev.of_node;
@@ -727,9 +944,12 @@ static int mpc_dma_probe(struct platform_device *op)
 	dma->device_issue_pending = mpc_dma_issue_pending;
 	dma->device_tx_status = mpc_dma_tx_status;
 	dma->device_prep_dma_memcpy = mpc_dma_prep_memcpy;
+	dma->device_prep_slave_sg = mpc_dma_prep_slave_sg;
+	dma->device_control = mpc_dma_device_control;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dma->channels);
 	dma_cap_set(DMA_MEMCPY, dma->cap_mask);
+	dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, dma->cap_mask);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dma->chancnt; i++) {
 		mchan = &mdma->channels[i];
-- 
1.8.4.2

Re: [PATCH RFC v7 2/6] dma: mpc512x: add support for peripheral transfers

From: Gerhard Sittig <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-13 00:07:49

[ removed DT from Cc: ]

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 17:25 +0400, Alexander Popov wrote:
Introduce support for slave s/g transfer preparation and the associated
device control callback in the MPC512x DMA controller driver, which adds
support for data transfers between memory and peripheral I/O to the
previously supported mem-to-mem transfers.

[ ... ]
quoted hunk
--- a/drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/mpc512x_dma.c
[ ... ]
quoted hunk
@@ -29,8 +30,15 @@
  */
 
 /*
- * This is initial version of MPC5121 DMA driver. Only memory to memory
- * transfers are supported (tested using dmatest module).
+ * MPC512x and MPC8308 DMA driver. It supports
+ * memory to memory data transfers (tested using dmatest module) and
+ * data transfers between memory and peripheral I/O memory
+ * by means of slave s/g with these limitations:
+ * - chunked transfers (transfers with more than one part) are refused
+ * as long as proper support for scatter/gather is missing;
+ * - transfers on MPC8308 always start from software as this SoC appears
+ * not to have external request lines for peripheral flow control;
+ * - minimal memory <-> I/O memory transfer size is 4 bytes.
  */
Often I assume people would notice themselves, and apparently I'm
wrong. :)  Can you adjust the formatting such (here and
elsewhere) that the bullet list is clearly visible as such?
Flowing text like above obfuscates the fact that the content may
have a structure ...

There are known limitations which are not listed here, "minimal
transfer size" is incomplete.  It appears that you assume
constraints on start addresses as well as sizes/lengths.  Can you
update the documentation to match the implementation?
quoted hunk
@@ -251,8 +264,21 @@ static void mpc_dma_execute(struct mpc_dma_chan *mchan)
 	struct mpc_dma_desc *mdesc;
 	int cid = mchan->chan.chan_id;
 
-	/* Move all queued descriptors to active list */
-	list_splice_tail_init(&mchan->queued, &mchan->active);
+	while (!list_empty(&mchan->queued)) {
+		mdesc = list_first_entry(&mchan->queued,
+						struct mpc_dma_desc, node);
+
+		/* Grab either several mem-to-mem transfer descriptors
+		 * or one peripheral transfer descriptor,
+		 * don't mix mem-to-mem and peripheral transfer descriptors
+		 * within the same 'active' list. */
+		if (mdesc->will_access_peripheral) {
+			if (list_empty(&mchan->active))
+				list_move_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->active);
+			break;
+		} else
+			list_move_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->active);
+	}
 
 	/* Chain descriptors into one transaction */
 	list_for_each_entry(mdesc, &mchan->active, node) {
There are style issues.  Both in multi line comments, and in the
braces of the if/else block.
quoted hunk
@@ -643,6 +680,186 @@ mpc_dma_prep_memcpy(struct dma_chan *chan, dma_addr_t dst, dma_addr_t src,
 	return &mdesc->desc;
 }
 
+static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
+mpc_dma_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *chan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
+		unsigned int sg_len, enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
+		unsigned long flags, void *context)
+{
+	struct mpc_dma *mdma = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma(chan);
+	struct mpc_dma_chan *mchan = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma_chan(chan);
+	struct mpc_dma_desc *mdesc = NULL;
+	dma_addr_t per_paddr;
+	u32 tcd_nunits;
+	struct mpc_dma_tcd *tcd;
+	unsigned long iflags;
+	struct scatterlist *sg;
+	size_t len;
+	int iter, i;
Personally I much dislike this style of mixing declarations and
instructions.  But others may disagree, and strongly so.
+
+	/* currently there is no proper support for scatter/gather */
+	if (sg_len != 1)
+		return NULL;
+
+	for_each_sg(sgl, sg, sg_len, i) {
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+
+		mdesc = list_first_entry(&mchan->free, struct mpc_dma_desc,
+									node);
style (continuation and indentation)
+		if (!mdesc) {
+			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+			/* try to free completed descriptors */
+			mpc_dma_process_completed(mdma);
+			return NULL;
+		}
+
+		list_del(&mdesc->node);
+
+		per_paddr = mchan->per_paddr;
+		tcd_nunits = mchan->tcd_nunits;
+
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+
+		if (per_paddr == 0 || tcd_nunits == 0)
+			goto err_prep;
+
+		mdesc->error = 0;
+		mdesc->will_access_peripheral = 1;
+		tcd = mdesc->tcd;
+
+		/* Prepare Transfer Control Descriptor for this transaction */
+
+		memset(tcd, 0, sizeof(struct mpc_dma_tcd));
+
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(sg_dma_address(sg), 4))
+			goto err_prep;
You found multiple ways of encoding the "4 byte alignment", using
both the fixed number as well as (several) symbolic identifiers.
Can you look into making them use the same condition if the same
motivation is behind the test?
+
+		if (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
+			tcd->saddr = per_paddr;
+			tcd->daddr = sg_dma_address(sg);
+			tcd->soff = 0;
+			tcd->doff = 4;
+		} else if (direction == DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) {
+			tcd->saddr = sg_dma_address(sg);
+			tcd->daddr = per_paddr;
+			tcd->soff = 4;
+			tcd->doff = 0;
+		} else
+			goto err_prep;
+
+		tcd->ssize = MPC_DMA_TSIZE_4;
+		tcd->dsize = MPC_DMA_TSIZE_4;
+
+		len = sg_dma_len(sg);
+		tcd->nbytes = tcd_nunits * 4;
+		if (!IS_ALIGNED(len, tcd->nbytes))
+			goto err_prep;
+
+		iter = len / tcd->nbytes;
+		if (iter >= 1 << 15) {
+			/* len is too big */
+			goto err_prep;
+		} else {
+			/* citer_linkch contains the high bits of iter */
+			tcd->biter = iter & 0x1ff;
+			tcd->biter_linkch = iter >> 9;
+			tcd->citer = tcd->biter;
+			tcd->citer_linkch = tcd->biter_linkch;
+		}
+
+		tcd->e_sg = 0;
+		tcd->d_req = 1;
+
+		/* Place descriptor in prepared list */
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+		list_add_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->prepared);
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+	}
+
+	return &mdesc->desc;
+
+err_prep:
+	/* Put the descriptor back */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+	list_add_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->free);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+
+	return NULL;
+}

virtually yours
Gerhard Sittig
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80  Email: office@denx.de

Re: [PATCH RFC v7 2/6] dma: mpc512x: add support for peripheral transfers

From: Alexander Popov <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-19 14:45:24

[ adding dmaengine ML to Cc: ]

Thanks for your feedback, Gerhard

2014-02-13 4:07 GMT+04:00 Gerhard Sittig [off-list ref]:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 17:25 +0400, Alexander Popov wrote:
quoted
 /*
- * This is initial version of MPC5121 DMA driver. Only memory to memory
- * transfers are supported (tested using dmatest module).
+ * MPC512x and MPC8308 DMA driver. It supports
+ * memory to memory data transfers (tested using dmatest module) and
+ * data transfers between memory and peripheral I/O memory
+ * by means of slave s/g with these limitations:
+ * - chunked transfers (transfers with more than one part) are refused
+ * as long as proper support for scatter/gather is missing;
+ * - transfers on MPC8308 always start from software as this SoC appears
+ * not to have external request lines for peripheral flow control;
+ * - minimal memory <-> I/O memory transfer size is 4 bytes.
  */
Often I assume people would notice themselves, and apparently I'm
wrong. :)  Can you adjust the formatting such (here and
elsewhere) that the bullet list is clearly visible as such?
Flowing text like above obfuscates the fact that the content may
have a structure ...
Ok, thanks :)
There are known limitations which are not listed here, "minimal
transfer size" is incomplete.  It appears that you assume
constraints on start addresses as well as sizes/lengths.  Can you
update the documentation to match the implementation?
Ok, I see. How about that?
* - minimal memory <-> I/O memory transfer chunk is 4 bytes and consequently
*     source and destination addresses must be 4-byte aligned
*     and transfer size must be aligned on (4 * maxburst) boundary;
quoted
+             /* Grab either several mem-to-mem transfer descriptors
+              * or one peripheral transfer descriptor,
+              * don't mix mem-to-mem and peripheral transfer descriptors
+              * within the same 'active' list. */
+             if (mdesc->will_access_peripheral) {
+                     if (list_empty(&mchan->active))
+                             list_move_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->active);
+                     break;
+             } else
+                     list_move_tail(&mdesc->node, &mchan->active);
+     }
There are style issues.  Both in multi line comments, and in the
braces of the if/else block.
Ah, thanks! I'll fix that.
quoted
+     struct mpc_dma *mdma = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma(chan);
+     struct mpc_dma_chan *mchan = dma_chan_to_mpc_dma_chan(chan);
+     struct mpc_dma_desc *mdesc = NULL;
+     dma_addr_t per_paddr;
+     u32 tcd_nunits;
+     struct mpc_dma_tcd *tcd;
+     unsigned long iflags;
+     struct scatterlist *sg;
+     size_t len;
+     int iter, i;
Personally I much dislike this style of mixing declarations and
instructions.  But others may disagree, and strongly so.
Excuse me, I would like to keep it similar to other parts of this driver
and not to change that style.
quoted
+             mdesc = list_first_entry(&mchan->free, struct mpc_dma_desc,
+                                                                     node);
style (continuation and indentation)
Thanks! I'll fix that.
quoted
+             if (!mdesc) {
+                     spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+                     /* try to free completed descriptors */
+                     mpc_dma_process_completed(mdma);
+                     return NULL;
+             }
+
+             list_del(&mdesc->node);
+
+             per_paddr = mchan->per_paddr;
+             tcd_nunits = mchan->tcd_nunits;
+
+             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mchan->lock, iflags);
+
+             if (per_paddr == 0 || tcd_nunits == 0)
+                     goto err_prep;
+
+             mdesc->error = 0;
+             mdesc->will_access_peripheral = 1;
+             tcd = mdesc->tcd;
+
+             /* Prepare Transfer Control Descriptor for this transaction */
+
+             memset(tcd, 0, sizeof(struct mpc_dma_tcd));
+
+             if (!IS_ALIGNED(sg_dma_address(sg), 4))
+                     goto err_prep;
You found multiple ways of encoding the "4 byte alignment", using
both the fixed number as well as (several) symbolic identifiers.
Can you look into making them use the same condition if the same
motivation is behind the test?
Gerhard, I don't see checks which can be kind of "merged"
since they have different motivation behind:
1) src_addr_width and dst_addr_width have type "enum dma_slave_buswidth"
and are compared with DMA_SLAVE_BUSWIDTH_4_BYTES which has
the same type;
2) source and destination addresses are checked to be 4-byte aligned;
3) transfer size is checked to be aligned on nbytes boundary
which is (4 * maxburst).

I think the code provides good readability. What do you think?

Thank you!

Best regards,
Alexander
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help