In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <redacted>
---
V2 change log:
Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right topology.
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
@@ -120,25 +120,36 @@
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@50 {
- compatible = "at24,24c64";
- reg = <0x50>;
- };
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@57 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x57>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
- reg = <0x68>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible = "philips,pca9547";
+ reg = <0x77>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ channel@0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0>;
+ eeprom@50 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c64";
+ reg = <0x50>;
+ };
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@57 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x57>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg = <0x68>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
index 0555976..ae68595 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
@@ -118,34 +118,45 @@
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@52 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x52>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@54 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x54>;
- };
- eeprom@55 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x55>;
- };
- eeprom@56 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x56>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
- reg = <0x68>;
- interrupts = <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible = "philips,pca9547";
+ reg = <0x77>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ channel@0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0>;
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@52 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x52>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@54 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x54>;
+ };
+ eeprom@55 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x55>;
+ };
+ eeprom@56 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x56>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg = <0x68>;
+ interrupts = <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
};--
1.8.0
On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
=20
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <redacted>
---
V2 change log:
Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right =
topology.
=20
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 =
++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
quoted hunk
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
=20
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi =
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
quoted hunk
index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
};
=20
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@50 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c64";
- reg =3D <0x50>;
- };
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@57 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x57>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
- reg =3D <0x68>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible =3D "philips,pca9547";
We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.
+ reg =3D <0x77>;
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ channel@0 {
channel should probably be i2c
[same comments below]
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ reg =3D <0>;
+ eeprom@50 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c64";
+ reg =3D <0x50>;
+ };
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@57 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x57>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible =3D =
"dallas,ds3232";
quoted hunk
+ reg =3D <0x68>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
=20
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts =
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
quoted hunk
index 0555976..ae68595 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
};
=20
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@52 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x52>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@54 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x54>;
- };
- eeprom@55 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x55>;
- };
- eeprom@56 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x56>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
- reg =3D <0x68>;
- interrupts =3D <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible =3D "philips,pca9547";
+ reg =3D <0x77>;
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ channel@0 {
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ reg =3D <0>;
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@52 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x52>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@54 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x54>;
+ };
+ eeprom@55 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x55>;
+ };
+ eeprom@56 {
+ compatible =3D =
"at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x56>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible =3D =
"dallas,ds3232";
+ reg =3D <0x68>;
+ interrupts =3D <0x1 0x1 =
0 0>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
};
--=20
1.8.0
=20
=20
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:41 AM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
Wei.Yang@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and
T4240QDS
=20
=20
On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
=20
quoted
In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <redacted>
---
V2 change log:
Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right
topology.
quoted
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
-------
quoted
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
quoted
index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@50 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c64";
- reg =3D <0x50>;
- };
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@57 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x57>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
- reg =3D <0x68>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible =3D "philips,pca9547";
=20
We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.
=20
quoted
+ reg =3D <0x77>;
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ channel@0 {
=20
channel should probably be i2c
Is there any standard for the name?
i2c is ok but I think channel is more intuitional.
Hi Scott,
What do you think of it.
Thanks.
-Hongtao
=20
[same comments below]
=20
quoted
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ reg =3D <0>;
+ eeprom@50 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c64";
+ reg =3D <0x50>;
+ };
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@57 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x57>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg =3D <0x68>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
quoted
index 0555976..ae68595 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@52 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x52>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@54 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x54>;
- };
- eeprom@55 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x55>;
- };
- eeprom@56 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x56>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
- reg =3D <0x68>;
- interrupts =3D <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible =3D "philips,pca9547";
+ reg =3D <0x77>;
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ channel@0 {
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ reg =3D <0>;
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@52 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x52>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@54 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x54>;
+ };
+ eeprom@55 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x55>;
+ };
+ eeprom@56 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x56>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg =3D <0x68>;
+ interrupts =3D <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
};
--
1.8.0
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
=20
On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:41 AM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
Wei.Yang@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and
T4240QDS
On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
quoted
In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <redacted>
---
V2 change log:
Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right
topology.
quoted
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
-------
quoted
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
quoted
index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@50 {
- compatible = "at24,24c64";
- reg = <0x50>;
- };
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@57 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x57>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
- reg = <0x68>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible = "philips,pca9547";
We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.
This is based on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
quoted
quoted
+ reg = <0x77>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ channel@0 {
channel should probably be i2c
Is there any standard for the name?
i2c is ok but I think channel is more intuitional.
Hi Scott,
What do you think of it.
Basing my comments on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt
Thanks.
-Hongtao
quoted
[same comments below]
quoted
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0>;
+ eeprom@50 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c64";
+ reg = <0x50>;
+ };
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@57 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x57>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg = <0x68>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
quoted
index 0555976..ae68595 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@52 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x52>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@54 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x54>;
- };
- eeprom@55 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x55>;
- };
- eeprom@56 {
- compatible = "at24,24c256";
- reg = <0x56>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
- reg = <0x68>;
- interrupts = <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible = "philips,pca9547";
+ reg = <0x77>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ channel@0 {
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ reg = <0>;
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@52 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x52>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@54 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x54>;
+ };
+ eeprom@55 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x55>;
+ };
+ eeprom@56 {
+ compatible = "at24,24c256";
+ reg = <0x56>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible = "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg = <0x68>;
+ interrupts = <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
};
--
1.8.0
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Great thanks.
I will update the patch and send it soon.
-Hongtao
-----Original Message-----
From: Linuxppc-dev [mailto:linuxppc-dev-
bounces+b38951=3Dfreescale.com@lists.ozlabs.org] On Behalf Of Kumar Gala
Sent: Saturday, September 07, 2013 12:10 AM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: Wood Scott-B07421; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org;
Wei.Yang@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4 and
T4240QDS
=20
=20
On Sep 5, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Jia Hongtao-B38951 wrote:
=20
quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2013 2:41 AM
To: Jia Hongtao-B38951
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wood Scott-B07421;
Wei.Yang@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] powerpc: Add I2C bus multiplexer node for B4
and T4240QDS
On Sep 4, 2013, at 9:41 PM, Jia Hongtao wrote:
quoted
In both B4 and T4240QDS platform PCA9547 I2C bus multiplexer is used.
The sub-nodes are also reorganized according to right I2C topology.
Signed-off-by: Jia Hongtao <redacted>
---
V2 change log:
Reorganized the sub-nodes under I2C multiplexer to represent right
topology.
quoted
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi | 49 +++++++++++++++++-----------
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts | 67
++++++++++++++++++++++---------
-------
quoted
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
quoted
index e6d2f8f..de8cb38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/b4qds.dtsi
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@50 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c64";
- reg =3D <0x50>;
- };
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@57 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x57>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
- reg =3D <0x68>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible =3D "philips,pca9547";
We seem to be using nxp instead of philips now.
=20
This is based on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
=20
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ reg =3D <0x77>;
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ channel@0 {
channel should probably be i2c
Is there any standard for the name?
i2c is ok but I think channel is more intuitional.
Hi Scott,
What do you think of it.
=20
Basing my comments on Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-mux.txt
=20
=20
quoted
Thanks.
-Hongtao
quoted
[same comments below]
quoted
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ reg =3D <0>;
+ eeprom@50 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c64";
+ reg =3D <0x50>;
+ };
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@57 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x57>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg =3D <0x68>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
quoted
index 0555976..ae68595 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/t4240qds.dts
};
i2c@118000 {
- eeprom@51 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x51>;
- };
- eeprom@52 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x52>;
- };
- eeprom@53 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x53>;
- };
- eeprom@54 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x54>;
- };
- eeprom@55 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x55>;
- };
- eeprom@56 {
- compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
- reg =3D <0x56>;
- };
- rtc@68 {
- compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
- reg =3D <0x68>;
- interrupts =3D <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ pca9547@77 {
+ compatible =3D "philips,pca9547";
+ reg =3D <0x77>;
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ channel@0 {
+ #address-cells =3D <1>;
+ #size-cells =3D <0>;
+ reg =3D <0>;
+ eeprom@51 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x51>;
+ };
+ eeprom@52 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x52>;
+ };
+ eeprom@53 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x53>;
+ };
+ eeprom@54 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x54>;
+ };
+ eeprom@55 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x55>;
+ };
+ eeprom@56 {
+ compatible =3D "at24,24c256";
+ reg =3D <0x56>;
+ };
+ rtc@68 {
+ compatible =3D "dallas,ds3232";
+ reg =3D <0x68>;
+ interrupts =3D <0x1 0x1 0 0>;
+ };
+ };
};
};
};
--
1.8.0
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
=20
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev