# Re: Please revert 928bea964827d7824b548c1f8e06eccbbc4d0d7d

- From: Yinghai Lu \<yinghai@kernel.org\>
- Date: 2013-09-27 21:54:08 
- List: linuxppc-dev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2013/09/4124165
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linux-pci/2013/09/4123721/t.md

```text
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[ref] wrote:

> Wouldn't it be better to simply have pci_enable_device() always set bus
> master on a bridge? I don't see any case where it makes sense to have
> an enabled bridge without the master bit set on it...

Do you mean attached?
```

## Attachments

- [pci\_set\_master\_again.patch](https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2013/09/4124165/attachment/0) (application/octet-stream, 510 bytes)