Update MAINTAINERS to reflect recent changes.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <redacted>
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 5be702c..b447392 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6146,10 +6146,14 @@ F: drivers/firmware/pcdp.*
PCI ERROR RECOVERY
M: Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com>
+M: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
L: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
+L: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
S: Supported
F: Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.txt
F: Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt
+F: arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh*.c
+F: drivers/pci/pcie/aer/
PCI SUBSYSTEM
M: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
--
1.7.5.4
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:59 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
quoted hunk
Update MAINTAINERS to reflect recent changes.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <redacted>
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 5be702c..b447392 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6146,10 +6146,14 @@ F: drivers/firmware/pcdp.*
PCI ERROR RECOVERY
M:
+M: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Remove Linas, he isn't involved anymore as far as I can tell
(are you ?)
L: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
+L: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
S: Supported
F: Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.txt
F: Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt
+F: arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh*.c
+F: drivers/pci/pcie/aer/
Not sure about the AER code. You are not maintaining *that* at least :-)
Maybe we should split EEH from the rest ?
Cheers,
Ben.
PCI SUBSYSTEM
M: Bjorn Helgaas [off-list ref]
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 12:11:29PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:59 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
quoted
Update MAINTAINERS to reflect recent changes.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <redacted>
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 5be702c..b447392 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6146,10 +6146,14 @@ F: drivers/firmware/pcdp.*
PCI ERROR RECOVERY
M:
+M: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Remove Linas, he isn't involved anymore as far as I can tell
(are you ?)
quoted
L: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
+L: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
S: Supported
F: Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.txt
F: Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt
+F: arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh*.c
+F: drivers/pci/pcie/aer/
Not sure about the AER code. You are not maintaining *that* at least :-)
Maybe we should split EEH from the rest ?
Ok. Split EEH from it and keep everything for "PCI ERROR RECOVERY".
Thanks,
Gavin
Hi,
On 27 June 2013 21:11, Benjamin Herrenschmidt [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:59 +0800, Gavin Shan wrote:
quoted
Update MAINTAINERS to reflect recent changes.
Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <redacted>
---
MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 5be702c..b447392 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -6146,10 +6146,14 @@ F: drivers/firmware/pcdp.*
PCI ERROR RECOVERY
M:
+M: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Remove Linas, he isn't involved anymore as far as I can tell
(are you ?)
Not involved any more; I don't have access to equipment, don't have
time, expertise is fading.
quoted
L: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
+L: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
S: Supported
F: Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.txt
F: Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt
+F: arch/powerpc/kernel/eeh*.c
+F: drivers/pci/pcie/aer/
Not sure about the AER code. You are not maintaining *that* at least :-)
Maybe we should split EEH from the rest ?
Based on recent discussions (a month ago?) regarding AER, its clear
that at least some of the AER code is mis-designed, and that some of
the patches being submitted against it were making things worse. I
suggest keeping an eye on that ... the problem is that both AER and
EEH share a common framework in the PCI subsystem. As bugs in AER get
discovered, there's a chance that someone will submit a patch to the
common framework, or possibly start modifying assorted drivers, which
will then break EEH ... so I don't think it is wise/safe to ignore
AER.
(The point is that AER and EEH really should work exactly the same;
they differ merely by how they talk to the root port).
-- Linas