From: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
Use for_each_compatible_node() macro instead of open coding it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
index bd12588..a7b3621 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
@@ -206,9 +206,7 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_mds_reset_ucc_phys(void)
setbits8(&bcsr_regs[7], BCSR7_UCC12_GETHnRST);
clrbits8(&bcsr_regs[8], BCSR8_UEM_MARVELL_RST);
- for (np = NULL; (np = of_find_compatible_node(np,
- "network",
- "ucc_geth")) != NULL;) {
+ for_each_compatible_node(np, "network", "ucc_geth") {
const unsigned int *prop;
int ucc_num;
On Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:36:03 -0500, Wei Yongjun [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
Use for_each_compatible_node() macro instead of open coding it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <redacted>
quoted hunk
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
index bd12588..a7b3621 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c
@@ -206,9 +206,7 @@ static void __init mpc85xx_mds_reset_ucc_phys(void)
setbits8(&bcsr_regs[7], BCSR7_UCC12_GETHnRST);
clrbits8(&bcsr_regs[8], BCSR8_UEM_MARVELL_RST);
- for (np = NULL; (np = of_find_compatible_node(np,
- "network",
- "ucc_geth")) != NULL;) {
+ for_each_compatible_node(np, "network", "ucc_geth") {
const unsigned int *prop;
int ucc_num;
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
On Dec 3, 2012, at 7:36 AM, Wei Yongjun wrote:
From: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
Use for_each_compatible_node() macro instead of open coding it.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
applied to next
- k