[PATCH v2 1/7] ASoC: fsl: add PPC_MPC52xx dependency to SND_POWERPC_SOC

From: Eric Millbrandt <redacted>

mpc52xx socs need to define SND_POWERPC_SOC to build ASoC drivers.

Signed-off-by: Eric Millbrandt <redacted>
---
Changes since v1:
Patch was "powerpc/52xx: define FSL_SOC"
Changed from defining FSL_SOC for PPC_MPC52xx to adding PPC_MPC52xx as a
dependency of SND_POWERPC_SOC as per Anatolij Gustschin's comment.

 sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig b/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig
index d701330..4563b28 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ config SND_SOC_FSL_UTILS
 
 menuconfig SND_POWERPC_SOC
 	tristate "SoC Audio for Freescale PowerPC CPUs"
-	depends on FSL_SOC
+	depends on FSL_SOC || PPC_MPC52xx
 	help
 	  Say Y or M if you want to add support for codecs attached to
 	  the PowerPC CPUs.

-- 
1.7.2.5

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:51:25AM -0400,  wrote:

From: Eric Millbrandt <redacted>

mpc52xx socs need to define SND_POWERPC_SOC to build ASoC drivers.

Signed-off-by: Eric Millbrandt <redacted>
---
Changes since v1:
Patch was "powerpc/52xx: define FSL_SOC"
Changed from defining FSL_SOC for PPC_MPC52xx to adding PPC_MPC52xx as a
dependency of SND_POWERPC_SOC as per Anatolij Gustschin's comment.

Patches 2 to 7 appear to have gone AWOL?

On 2012-09-19 Mark Brown wrote:

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:51:25AM -0400,  wrote:

quoted

From: Eric Millbrandt <redacted>

mpc52xx socs need to define SND_POWERPC_SOC to build ASoC drivers.

Signed-off-by: Eric Millbrandt <redacted> ---
Changes since v1: Patch was "powerpc/52xx: define FSL_SOC" Changed from
defining FSL_SOC for PPC_MPC52xx to adding PPC_MPC52xx as a dependency
of SND_POWERPC_SOC as per Anatolij Gustschin's comment.

Patches 2 to 7 appear to have gone AWOL?

No changes to 2 through 7, so I didn't repost the full series.

Eric



-DISCLAIMER: an automatically appended disclaimer may follow. By posting-
-to a public e-mail mailing list I hereby grant permission to distribute-
-and copy this message.-

This e-mail and the information, including any attachments, it contains are=
 intended to be a confidential communication only to the person or entity t=
o whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. If t=
he reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby not=
ified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication=
 is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, =
please immediately notify the sender and destroy the original message.

Thank you.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 05:07:34PM -0400, Eric Millbrandt wrote:

On 2012-09-19 Mark Brown wrote:

quoted

Patches 2 to 7 appear to have gone AWOL?

No changes to 2 through 7, so I didn't repost the full series.

Then this isn't patch 1/7, it's just a patch.  The fact that you may
have posted some patches earlier isn't relevant and creates confusion
like this.