[PATCH] pseries: double NR_CPUS in defconfig
Subsystems:
linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit) , the rest
STALE5077d
4 messages,
2 authors,
2012-09-13 · open the first message on its own page
Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting a
good lead on testing.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <redacted>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig b/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig
index 1f65b3c..a0e0e53 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/pseries_defconfig @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ CONFIG_PPC64=y
CONFIG_ALTIVEC=y
CONFIG_VSX=y
CONFIG_SMP=y
- CONFIG_NR_CPUS=1024
+ CONFIG_NR_CPUS=2048
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
CONFIG_SYSVIPC=y
CONFIG_POSIX_MQUEUE=y
Hi,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan [off-list ref] wrote:
Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting a
good lead on testing.
Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig.
Should this one be as well?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Hi Stephen,
On 13.09.2012 [22:37:39 +1000], Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan [off-list ref] wrote: quoted
Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting
a good lead on testing.
Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig.
Should this one be as well?
Ah, I didn't realize that was the case, sorry. Yes, it probably does
make sense to do this change. Should I just send a follow-on patch?
Thanks,
Nish
On 13.09.2012 [11:00:11 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: Hi Stephen,
On 13.09.2012 [22:37:39 +1000], Stephen Rothwell wrote: quoted Hi,
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 10:47:07 -0700 Nishanth Aravamudan [off-list ref] wrote: quoted
Anticipating growth in coming years, we should ensure we are getting
a good lead on testing.
Most changes to pseries_defconfig are copied into ppc64_defconfig.
Should this one be as well?
Ah, I didn't realize that was the case, sorry. Yes, it probably does
make sense to do this change. Should I just send a follow-on patch?
Actually, ppc64_defconfig doesn't currently define CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
NR_CPUS' powerpc Kconfig allows 2-8192 already, so given the current
state, I'm not sure any further patch is necessary?
Thanks,
Nish