# RE: \[2/3\]\[PATCH\]\[v2\] TDM Framework

- From: Singh Sandeep-B37400 \<hidden\>
- Date: 2012-08-01 12:14:37 
- List: linuxppc-dev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2012/08/3901707
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2012/07/3899802/t.md

```text



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:<redacted>]
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 9:32 PM
> To: Singh Sandeep-B37400
> Cc: Francois Romieu; <redacted>; linuxppc-
> dev@lists.ozlabs.org; galak@kernel.crashing.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [2/3][PATCH][v2] TDM Framework
>=20
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:50:57AM +0000, Singh Sandeep-B37400 wrote:
> > 1. You should send some kernel mode TDM clients. Without those the
> framework
> >    is pretty useless.
> > [Sandeep] We do have a test client but not good enough to be pushed in
> > open source, should we add it to documentation??
>=20
> Then how do you know if the framework is "correct" and good enough for
> real clients?  We don't add frameworks, or apis, to the kernel without
> users, so you will have to come up with some users before we can accept
> it.
We can only say that this framework is available in FSL BSPs and being used=
 by VoIP companies.
But running a complete voice stack itself is beyond the scope of Freescale.
So vendors integrate their solutions with FSL solution.
To test the framework we have a small application in our BSP (this is a ver=
y basic test client) which tests the TDM driver and the SLIC interface from=
 voice  transfer perspective.
We can get this added in the Linux codebase in some test directory. What co=
uld be a good place for this?

Regards
Sandeep
```