[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix sram_offset parameter type

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE5160d

4 messages, 2 authors, 2012-07-26 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix sram_offset parameter type

From: Claudiu Manoil <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-19 10:28:28

The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address
and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix,
the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and
fixed.
This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of
0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning
-EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <redacted>
---
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h |    4 +-
 arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c     |   39 ++++++++++------------------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /*
- * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
+ * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
  *
  * QorIQ based Cache Controller Memory Mapped Registers
  *
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct mpc85xx_l2ctlr {
 
 struct sram_parameters {
 	unsigned int sram_size;
-	uint64_t sram_offset;
+	phys_addr_t sram_offset;
 };
 
 extern int instantiate_cache_sram(struct platform_device *dev,
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c
index 611bb4b..d65e785 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /*
- * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+ * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
  *
  * QorIQ (P1/P2) L2 controller init for Cache-SRAM instantiation
  *
@@ -31,24 +31,21 @@ static char *sram_size;
 static char *sram_offset;
 struct mpc85xx_l2ctlr __iomem *l2ctlr;
 
-static long get_cache_sram_size(void)
+static int get_cache_sram_params(struct sram_parameters *sram_params)
 {
-	unsigned long val;
+	unsigned long long addr;
+	unsigned int size;
 
-	if (!sram_size || (strict_strtoul(sram_size, 0, &val) < 0))
+	if (!sram_size || (kstrtouint(sram_size, 0, &size) < 0))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return val;
-}
-
-static long get_cache_sram_offset(void)
-{
-	unsigned long val;
-
-	if (!sram_offset || (strict_strtoul(sram_offset, 0, &val) < 0))
+	if (!sram_offset || (kstrtoull(sram_offset, 0, &addr) < 0))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return val;
+	sram_params->sram_offset = addr;
+	sram_params->sram_size = size;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int __init get_size_from_cmdline(char *str)
@@ -93,17 +90,9 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 	}
 	l2cache_size = *prop;
 
-	sram_params.sram_size  = get_cache_sram_size();
-	if ((int)sram_params.sram_size <= 0) {
-		dev_err(&dev->dev,
-			"Entire L2 as cache, Aborting Cache-SRAM stuff\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
-	}
-
-	sram_params.sram_offset  = get_cache_sram_offset();
-	if ((int64_t)sram_params.sram_offset <= 0) {
+	if (get_cache_sram_params(&sram_params)) {
 		dev_err(&dev->dev,
-			"Entire L2 as cache, provide a valid sram offset\n");
+			"Entire L2 as cache, provide valid sram offset and size\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
@@ -125,14 +114,14 @@ static int __devinit mpc85xx_l2ctlr_of_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
 	 * Write bits[0-17] to srbar0
 	 */
 	out_be32(&l2ctlr->srbar0,
-		sram_params.sram_offset & L2SRAM_BAR_MSK_LO18);
+		lower_32_bits(sram_params.sram_offset) & L2SRAM_BAR_MSK_LO18);
 
 	/*
 	 * Write bits[18-21] to srbare0
 	 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT
 	out_be32(&l2ctlr->srbarea0,
-		(sram_params.sram_offset >> 32) & L2SRAM_BARE_MSK_HI4);
+		upper_32_bits(sram_params.sram_offset) & L2SRAM_BARE_MSK_HI4);
 #endif
 
 	clrsetbits_be32(&l2ctlr->ctl, L2CR_L2E, L2CR_L2FI);
-- 
1.6.6

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix sram_offset parameter type

From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-19 12:08:04

On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address
and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix,
the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and
fixed.
This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of
0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning
-EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value.
=20
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h |    4 +-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c     |   39 =
++++++++++------------------
quoted hunk
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
=20
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h =
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
quoted hunk
index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
+ * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
we normally do 2009-2010, 2012
quoted hunk
 *
 * QorIQ based Cache Controller Memory Mapped Registers
 *
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ struct mpc85xx_l2ctlr {
=20
struct sram_parameters {
	unsigned int sram_size;
-	uint64_t sram_offset;
+	phys_addr_t sram_offset;
};
=20
=20
- k

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix sram_offset parameter type

From: Claudiu Manoil <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-26 12:39:36

On 7/19/2012 3:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
quoted
The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address
and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix,
the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and
fixed.
This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of
0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning
-EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h |    4 +-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c     |   39 ++++++++++------------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
+ * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
we normally do 2009-2010, 2012
Hi Kumar,

Should I re-spin this patch, with the copyright year formatted per your 
suggestion above?

Thanks,
claudiu

Re: [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Fix sram_offset parameter type

From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2012-07-26 13:18:23

On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
On 7/19/2012 3:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
=20
On Jul 19, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Claudiu Manoil wrote:
=20
quoted
The sram_offset parameter represents a physical address
and should be of type phys_addr_t. As part of this fix,
the extraction of sram_params is being cleaned-up and
fixed.
This patch fixes now the case when the offset value of
0xfff00000 was being rejected by the driver (returning
-EINVAL), although this is a valid offset value.
=20
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <redacted>
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h |    4 +-
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.c     |   39 =
++++++++++------------------
quoted
quoted
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
=20
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h =
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
quoted
quoted
index 60c9c0b..a4ce9b8 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
- * Copyright 2009-2010 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
+ * Copyright 2009-2010 2012 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc
=20
we normally do 2009-2010, 2012
=20
Hi Kumar,
=20
Should I re-spin this patch, with the copyright year formatted per =
your suggestion above?

please do

- k=
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help