Folks, bad news ... my fault.
I accidentally forgot a --signoff on a git am command last week, meaning
that a pair of patches are in -next and not signed off by me.
For various (legal) reasons that cannot go into Linus tree as-is, so I
have to rebase the tree to fix it.
Sorry about that ...
Cheers,
Ben.
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 11:51 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Folks, bad news ... my fault.
I accidentally forgot a --signoff on a git am command last week, meaning
that a pair of patches are in -next and not signed off by me.
For various (legal) reasons that cannot go into Linus tree as-is, so I
have to rebase the tree to fix it.
Sorry about that ...
Note that the rebase only affects the top 3 commits, so if your
tree is based on something older you're fine (Kumar, you seem to
be ok, I haven't checked Josh).
Cheers,
Ben.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:40 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, 2012-05-22 at 11:51 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted
Folks, bad news ... my fault.
I accidentally forgot a --signoff on a git am command last week, meaning
that a pair of patches are in -next and not signed off by me.
For various (legal) reasons that cannot go into Linus tree as-is, so I
have to rebase the tree to fix it.
Sorry about that ...
Note that the rebase only affects the top 3 commits, so if your
tree is based on something older you're fine (Kumar, you seem to
be ok, I haven't checked Josh).
Should be fine. Even if not, all 4 of its users will manage to cope.
josh