[PATCH] powerpc: 44x: Add mtd ndfc to the ppx44x defconfig

Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <redacted>
---

Again appologies for the SPAM trying to send this message.

 arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig b/arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig
index 6cdf1c0..3b98d73 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig

@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ CONFIG_MTD_CFI=y
 CONFIG_MTD_JEDECPROBE=y
 CONFIG_MTD_CFI_AMDSTD=y
 CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF=y
+CONFIG_MTD_NAND=m
+CONFIG_MTD_NAND_NDFC=m
 CONFIG_MTD_UBI=m
 CONFIG_MTD_UBI_GLUEBI=m
 CONFIG_PROC_DEVICETREE=y

-- 
1.7.6.4


Yours Tony

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tony Breeds [off-list ref] wrote:

Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <redacted>

Acked-by: Josh Boyer <redacted>

Ben, I don't have anything particularly urgent for 3.2 and this seems
like it is well within the 3.2 window (defconfig updates usually come
later).  Want to pick this up yourself, or do you want me to prep a
tree somewhere?

josh

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 20:04 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tony Breeds [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <redacted>

Acked-by: Josh Boyer <redacted>

Ben, I don't have anything particularly urgent for 3.2 and this seems
like it is well within the 3.2 window (defconfig updates usually come
later).  Want to pick this up yourself, or do you want me to prep a
tree somewhere?

I'm working on 3.3 right now, so I'd rather you throw this in there, I
doesn't seem to be particularily urgent for 3.2 is it? (who actually
uses 4xx_defconfig ?)

Cheers,
Ben.

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:34:44PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 20:04 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tony Breeds [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <redacted>

Acked-by: Josh Boyer <redacted>

Ben, I don't have anything particularly urgent for 3.2 and this seems
like it is well within the 3.2 window (defconfig updates usually come
later).  Want to pick this up yourself, or do you want me to prep a
tree somewhere?

I'm working on 3.3 right now, so I'd rather you throw this in there, I
doesn't seem to be particularily urgent for 3.2 is it? (who actually
uses 4xx_defconfig ?)

It's mostly for linux-next / kisskb

There was a compiler error added to ndfc in upstream[1].  The change was in
linux-next but nothing currently builds that code.  If we update
4xx_defconfig then linux-next will catch errors sooner.

So it's not urgent, but it doesn't hurt

[1] http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/127000/

Yours Tony

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 20:04 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Tony Breeds [off-list ref] w=

rote:

quoted

quoted

Signed-off-by: Tony Breeds <redacted>

Acked-by: Josh Boyer <redacted>

Ben, I don't have anything particularly urgent for 3.2 and this seems
like it is well within the 3.2 window (defconfig updates usually come
later). =A0Want to pick this up yourself, or do you want me to prep a
tree somewhere?

I'm working on 3.3 right now, so I'd rather you throw this in there, I
doesn't seem to be particularily urgent for 3.2 is it? (who actually

Urgent, no.  I'll get a tree going after the holidays.

uses 4xx_defconfig ?)

The linux-next tree builds it.  It would have caught a compile error
in the NDFC driver much earlier if we had it enabled in the defconfig.

josh