Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: Introduce a P1020 SoC device tree

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-10-20 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: Introduce a P1020 SoC device tree

From: Tabi Timur-B04825 <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-20 16:28:13

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Kumar Gala [off-list ref] wro=
te:
=A0arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020soc.dtsi | =A0262 +++++++++++++++++++++++++=
++++++++++

All of the other dtsi files are of the format "___si.dtsi".  Why does
this one use "___soc.dtsi"?

--=20
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale=

Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] powerpc/85xx: Introduce a P1020 SoC device tree

From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-20 20:56:09

On Oct 20, 2011, at 11:28 AM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Kumar Gala =
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
=20
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1020soc.dtsi |  262 =
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
=20
All of the other dtsi files are of the format "___si.dtsi".  Why does
this one use "___soc.dtsi"?
I intend to also have a ___si.dtsi, still playing around with this so we =
have less overall duplication to support both 32 & 36-bit address maps =
as an example.

- k=
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help