Re: [PATCH 5/5] [powerpc] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-08-09 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 5/5] [powerpc] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

From: Wolfgang Grandegger <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-09 19:32:09

On 08/09/2011 08:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
quoted
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up. 
The driver does not depend upon any properties other than the required properties
so we are removing the file.
That is not the criterion for whether something should be expresed in
the device tree.  It's a description of the hardware, not a Linux driver
configuration file.  If there are integration parameters that can not be
inferred from "this is FSL flexcan v1.0", they should be expressed in
the node.

Removing the binding altogether seems extreme as well -- we should have
bindings for all devices, even if there are no special properties.
Yes, of course. The commit message misleading. We do not intend to
remove the binding but just a few unused and confusing properties.
Concerning the compatible string, Freescale introduced for the Flexcan
on the P1010 "fsl,flexcan-v1.0". That's not the usual convention also
because the v1.0 if for the PowerPC cores only, I assume, but we have
ARM cores as well. If we need to distinguish I think we should use:

  "fsl,p1010-flexcan", "fsl,flexcan"

Do you agree?
quoted
Additionally, the p1010*dts files are not
following the standard for node naming in that they have a trailing -v1.0.
What "standard for node naming"?  There's nothing wrong with putting a
block version number in the compatible string, and it looks like the
p1010 dts files were following the binding document in this regard.  It
is common practice when the block version is publicly documented but
there's no register it can be read from at runtime.
See above.

Furthermore I must admit, that the bindings shown up mainline Linux have
never been presented on any mailing list.

Wolfgang.

Re: [PATCH 5/5] [powerpc] Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

From: Scott Wood <hidden>
Date: 2011-08-09 20:11:25

On 08/09/2011 02:32 PM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
On 08/09/2011 08:17 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
quoted
On 08/09/2011 09:43 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
quoted
In working with the socketcan developers, we have come to the conclusion
the fsl-flexcan device tree bindings need to be cleaned up. 
The driver does not depend upon any properties other than the required properties
so we are removing the file.
That is not the criterion for whether something should be expresed in
the device tree.  It's a description of the hardware, not a Linux driver
configuration file.  If there are integration parameters that can not be
inferred from "this is FSL flexcan v1.0", they should be expressed in
the node.

Removing the binding altogether seems extreme as well -- we should have
bindings for all devices, even if there are no special properties.
Yes, of course. The commit message misleading. We do not intend to
remove the binding but just a few unused and confusing properties.
Is it a matter of the current driver not caring, or the properties just
not making sense for any reasonable driver (ambiguous, inferrable from
the flexcan version, software configuration, etc)?

-Scott
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help