# Re: \[PATCH\] Add cpufreq driver for Momentum Maple boards

- From: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov \<hidden\>
- Date: 2011-06-17 11:13:03 
- List: linuxppc-dev
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2011/06/9464975
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2011/05/9464667/t.md

```text
Hello,

On 6/17/11, Arnd Bergmann [ref] wrote:
> On Friday 17 June 2011 10:49:16 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Add simple cpufreq driver for Maple-based boards (ppc970fx evaluation
>> kit and others). Driver is based on a cpufreq driver for 64-bit powermac
>> boxes with all pmac-dependant features removed and simple cleanup
>> applied.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <redacted>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_64.S          |    4 +-
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig         |    8 +
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/Makefile  |    1 +
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/cpufreq.c |  317
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 328 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/maple/cpufreq.c
>>
>
>
> I think new cpufreq drivers should live in drivers/cpufreq, not in arch/.
> We've
> started moving other drivers away from arch/x86 and arch/arm already.

What about drivers/cpufreq/powerpc, or it's an unnecessary?

Should I resumbit it, or there will be massive arch/powerpc ->
drivers/cpufreq move?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
```