linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree

2 messages, 2 authors, 2011-05-20 · open the first message on its own page

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree

From: Stephen Rothwell <hidden>
Date: 2011-05-20 04:14:31

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c between commit 23d72bfd8f9f ("powerpc:
Consolidate ipi message mux and demux") from the powerpc tree and commit
184748cc50b2 ("sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to
smp_send_reschedule()") from the tip tree.

The former superceded part of the latter's changes, so I just used the
former for that.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: 2011-05-20 05:39:04

On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:14 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c between commit 23d72bfd8f9f ("powerpc:
Consolidate ipi message mux and demux") from the powerpc tree and commit
184748cc50b2 ("sched: Provide scheduler_ipi() callback in response to
smp_send_reschedule()") from the tip tree.

The former superceded part of the latter's changes, so I just used the
former for that.
I've done the merge and resolved the conflict properly (it's actually
non trivial due to some other changes) in the powerpc tree, I'll send a
pull request to Linus later today.

Cheers,
Ben.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help