[PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors

Subsystems: linux for powerpc (32-bit and 64-bit), the rest

STALE6301d

3 messages, 3 authors, 2009-06-12 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors

From: Paul Mackerras <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-12 12:12:31

32-bit powerpc processors have no 64-bit atomic instructions, but we wi=
ll
need atomic64_t in order to support the perf_counter subsystem on 32-bi=
t
processors.

This adds an implementation of 64-bit atomic operations using hashed
spinlocks to provide atomicity.  For each atomic operation, the address=

of the atomic64_t variable is hashed to an index into an array of 16
spinlocks.  That spinlock is taken (with interrupts disabled) around th=
e
operation, which can then be coded non-atomically within the lock.

On UP, all the spinlock manipulation goes away and we simply disable
interrupts around each operation.  In fact gcc eliminates the whole
atomic64_lock variable as well.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
---
Compile-tested only at this stage, which is why it's [RFC].

 arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h |   29 ++++++
 arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile         |    2 +-
 arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c    |  173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=
++++++++
 3 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/powerpc/include/a=
sm/atomic.h
index b401950..45356d6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/atomic.h
@@ -470,6 +470,35 @@ static __inline__ int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64=
_t *v, long a, long u)
=20
 #define atomic64_inc_not_zero(v) atomic64_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
=20
+#else /* not __powerpc64__ */
+
+typedef struct {
+=09long long counter;
+} atomic64_t;
+
+#define ATOMIC64_INIT(i)=09{ (i) }
+
+extern long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v);
+extern void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i);
+extern void atomic64_add(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_add_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern void atomic64_sub(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_sub_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v);
+extern long long atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long long o, long lon=
g n);
+extern long long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long long new);
+extern int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u=
);
+
+#define atomic64_add_negative(a, v)=09(atomic64_add_return((a), (v)) <=
 0)
+#define atomic64_inc(v)=09=09=09(atomic64_add(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_inc_return(v)=09=09(atomic64_add_return(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_inc_and_test(v) =09(atomic64_inc_return(v) =3D=3D 0)
+#define atomic64_sub_and_test(a, v)=09(atomic64_sub_return((a), (v)) =3D=
=3D 0)
+#define atomic64_dec(v)=09=09=09(atomic64_sub(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_dec_return(v)=09=09(atomic64_sub_return(1LL, (v))
+#define atomic64_dec_and_test(v)=09(atomic64_dec_return((v)) =3D=3D 0)=

+#define atomic64_inc_not_zero(v) =09atomic64_add_unless((v), 1, 0)
+
 #endif /* __powerpc64__ */
=20
 #include <asm-generic/atomic.h>
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
index 29b742b..1537f13 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/Makefile
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ CFLAGS_REMOVE_feature-fixups.o =3D -pg
=20
 obj-y=09=09=09:=3D string.o alloc.o \
 =09=09=09   checksum_$(CONFIG_WORD_SIZE).o
-obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)=09+=3D div64.o copy_32.o crtsavres.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PPC32)=09+=3D div64.o copy_32.o crtsavres.o atomic64_32.o=

 obj-$(CONFIG_HAS_IOMEM)=09+=3D devres.o
=20
 obj-$(CONFIG_PPC64)=09+=3D copypage_64.o copyuser_64.o \
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c b/arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64=
_32.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c24b8a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/atomic64_32.c
@@ -0,0 +1,173 @@
+/*
+ * Implementation of 64-bit atomics on 32-bit PowerPC processors.
+ *
+ * Copyright =A9 2009 Paul Mackerras, IBM Corp. <paulus@au1.ibm.com>
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version
+ * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+ */
+#include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/cache.h>
+#include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <asm/atomic.h>
+
+/*
+ * We use a hashed array of spinlocks to provide exclusive access
+ * to each atomic64_t variable.  Since this is expected to used on
+ * systems with at most 4 processors, we use a relatively small
+ * array of 16 spinlocks.
+ */
+#define NR_LOCKS=0916
+
+/*
+ * Ensure each lock is in a separate cacheline on SMP.
+ */
+static union {
+=09spinlock_t lock;
+=09char pad[L1_CACHE_BYTES];
+} atomic64_lock[NR_LOCKS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
+
+static inline spinlock_t *lock_addr(const atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long addr =3D (unsigned long) v;
+
+=09addr >>=3D L1_CACHE_SHIFT;
+=09addr ^=3D (addr >> 8) ^ (addr >> 16);
+=09return &atomic64_lock[addr & (NR_LOCKS - 1)].lock;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09v->counter =3D i;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+}
+
+void atomic64_add(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09v->counter +=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+}
+
+long long atomic64_add_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter +=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+void atomic64_sub(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09v->counter -=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+}
+
+long long atomic64_sub_return(long long a, atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter -=3D a;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_dec_if_positive(atomic64_t *v)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter - 1;
+=09if (val >=3D 0)
+=09=09v->counter =3D val;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_cmpxchg(atomic64_t *v, long long o, long long n)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter;
+=09if (val =3D=3D o)
+=09=09v->counter =3D n;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+long long atomic64_xchg(atomic64_t *v, long long new)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09long long val;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09val =3D v->counter;
+=09v->counter =3D new;
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return val;
+}
+
+int atomic64_add_unless(atomic64_t *v, long long a, long long u)
+{
+=09unsigned long flags;
+=09spinlock_t *lock =3D lock_addr(v);
+=09int ret =3D 1;
+
+=09spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags);
+=09if (v->counter !=3D u) {
+=09=09v->counter +=3D a;
+=09=09ret =3D 0;
+=09}
+=09spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags);
+=09return ret;
+}
+
+static int init_atomic64_lock(void)
+{
+=09int i;
+
+=09for (i =3D 0; i < NR_LOCKS; ++i)
+=09=09spin_lock_init(&atomic64_lock[i].lock);
+=09return 0;
+}
+
+pure_initcall(init_atomic64_lock);
--=20
1.6.0.4

Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors

From: Kumar Gala <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-12 14:04:59

On Jun 12, 2009, at 7:02 AM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
32-bit powerpc processors have no 64-bit atomic instructions, but we  
will
need atomic64_t in order to support the perf_counter subsystem on 32- 
bit
processors.

This adds an implementation of 64-bit atomic operations using hashed
spinlocks to provide atomicity.  For each atomic operation, the  
address
of the atomic64_t variable is hashed to an index into an array of 16
spinlocks.  That spinlock is taken (with interrupts disabled) around  
the
operation, which can then be coded non-atomically within the lock.

On UP, all the spinlock manipulation goes away and we simply disable
interrupts around each operation.  In fact gcc eliminates the whole
atomic64_lock variable as well.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
---
Compile-tested only at this stage, which is why it's [RFC].
any reason not to make this lib/asm generic?  Seems like it isn't ppc  
specific.

- k

Re: [PATCH RFC] powerpc: Implement atomic64_t for 32-bit processors

From: Kyle McMartin <hidden>
Date: 2009-06-12 17:40:19

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 09:04:52AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
On UP, all the spinlock manipulation goes away and we simply disable
interrupts around each operation.  In fact gcc eliminates the whole
atomic64_lock variable as well.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <redacted>
---
Compile-tested only at this stage, which is why it's [RFC].
any reason not to make this lib/asm generic?  Seems like it isn't ppc  
specific.
Indeed... PA-RISC uses these for all atomics, since we have no useful
atomic insns to implement them... I'd be happy to submit a cleanup after
you merge this, if you don't have time to ahead of time.

regards, Kyle
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help