Please pull from 'next' branch

Please pull from 'next' branch of

	master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git next

to receive the following updates:

 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts            |   10
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_36b.dts        |  787 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_camp_core0.dts |    8
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_camp_core1.dts |    4
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-book3e.h          |  103 +++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu-fsl-booke.h       |   85 --
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h                 |    6
 arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_32.S                 |    6
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S           |   14
 arch/powerpc/mm/fsl_booke_mmu.c                |    6
 arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype         |    4
 11 files changed, 921 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)

Kumar Gala (5):
      powerpc/85xx: Fixed PCI IO region sizes in mpc8572ds*.dts
      powerpc/85xx: Added 36-bit physical device tree for mpc8572ds board
      powerpc/fsl-booke: Add new ISA 2.06 page sizes and MAS defines
      powerpc/book-3e: Introduce concept of Book-3e MMU
      powerpc/fsl-booke: Fix compile warning

I'd also like the opcode patch to go in since several patches depend on
that (doorbell, tlbilx).  If you want to ack the patch I can put it into
my next branch for you.

- k

I'd also like the opcode patch to go in since several patches depend on
that (doorbell, tlbilx).  If you want to ack the patch I can put it into
my next branch for you.

It's already in my test branch, which for some reason I forgot to push
out... Doing some updates now, you'll get it.

Cheers,
Ben.

On Feb 17, 2009, at 8:22 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

quoted

I'd also like the opcode patch to go in since several patches  
depend on
that (doorbell, tlbilx).  If you want to ack the patch I can put it  
into
my next branch for you.

It's already in my test branch, which for some reason I forgot to push
out... Doing some updates now, you'll get it.

ok. I was hoping for that one patch to migrate from test to next ;)

- k

On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 21:04 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote:

ok. I was hoping for that one patch to migrate from test to next ;)

Just pushed out to test, it has some collisions with merge and with
the ftrace stuff that I fixed up. I'll move it to next tomorrow, once
we've sorted out what tree the ftrace stuff is going through.

Ben.