Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes

3 messages, 2 authors, 2008-12-18 · open the first message on its own page

Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes

From: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Date: 2008-12-17 11:56:10

Hi Ben,
Mike Ditto (1):
      i2c-cpm: Detect and report NAK right away instead of timing out
Could you also have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/7452/ ?
(Discussion at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/6666/ )

IIRC, Kumar prefers to push this via your tree.

Thanks,
Jochen

Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes

From: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
Date: 2008-12-18 10:35:52

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:55:06PM +0100, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Hi Ben,
quoted
Mike Ditto (1):
      i2c-cpm: Detect and report NAK right away instead of timing out
Could you also have a look at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/7452/ ?
(Discussion at http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/6666/ )

IIRC, Kumar prefers to push this via your tree.
Ok, but this isn't really a fix, so I'll look at putting it into my
i2c-next tree, not i2c-fixes.

-- 
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'

Re: Please pull bjdoo ks' i2c-fixes

From: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Date: 2008-12-18 11:13:54

Ben Dooks schrieb:
Ok, but this isn't really a fix, so I'll look at putting it into my
i2c-next tree, not i2c-fixes.
That's OK for me.

Thanks,
Jochen
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help