RE: [PATCH] Linux Device Driver for Xilinx LL TEMAC 10/100/1000 EthernetNIC
From: John Linn <hidden>
Date: 2008-08-19 21:42:14
I screwed up and forgot to copy all on this previously.
-----Original Message----- From: David H. Lynch Jr. [mailto:<redacted>] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 3:19 PM To: John Linn Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Device Driver for Xilinx LL TEMAC
10/100/1000 EthernetNIC
=
John Linn wrote:quoted
quoted
Stephen wants OF support -which is fine, but I can not test
that.
quoted
quoted
I definitely agree with Stephen that OF support is needed since
arch/ppc
quoted
has gone away. We aren't doing any new work on arch/ppc. Are you not planning to move to arch/powerpc anytime soon? I could
help
quoted
you with that transition which would be better in the long run. I'd rather do that than do testing for you as I think it would be more productive, but I've been wrong before.=
We will move to powerpc, but not in the time-frame I am hoping for
this
driver. In the context of Linux and Pico, "we" means me, and there is no time
to
do the work anytime soon. =
<snip> What about you getting all the review & testing done and then we (Xilinx) will add the OF support to the driver? = I doubt the powerpc mainline will take the driver without OF support. In fact, we had to remove the platform bus support from the last driver that we put into mainline for arch/powerpc.
=
quoted
quoted
I would like one and only one tag that can be used end-end. Is there something xilinx will object to ? Prefer ? ....xilinx_<device name>, (xilinx_lltemac or xilinx_ps2) is what we use
for
quoted
file names. The device tree does use "xlnx" to identify xilinx
devices,
quoted
but I don't think that should dictate file names. We have a driver in out GIT tree that is not flat (as most know) for
the
quoted
LL TEMAC and we are working on creating flat drivers for future
devices.
quoted
Ideally this new driver would be a replacement for our driver.=
Give me a name and I will go with it. the xps_lltemac name came from Yoshio, It is not in stone. =
If I name the module "xilinx_lltemac" and go with xilinx_lltemac.c for the file name, is that going to cause problems with xilinx ? =
I will use whatever you recomend.
xilinx_lltemac is the preferred. = I don't think using xilinx_lltemac should cause problems. Our Xilinx Git tree has a xilinx_lltemac subdir that contains the non-flat driver but that should be ok with your xilinx_lltemac.c file in the net directory.
=
-- Dave Lynch DLA Systems Software Development:
Embedded Linux
717.627.3770 dhlii@dlasys.net http://www.dlasys.net fax: 1.253.369.9244 Cell: 1.717.587.7774 Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies
too numerous to list.
=
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
takes a touch of genius - and a
lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein =
This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named r= ecipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary= , privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intend= ed recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attac= hments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.