RE: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org]=20
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:08 PM
To: Josh Boyer
Cc: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org;=20
rsmadhvesh@vsnl.net; Paul Mackerras
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e
=20

This looks like the binutils problem that cell was having and I =20
believe Alan Modra fixed:
=20
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-05/msg00008.html
=20

Thanks, is it posible to get latest binutils binary which
is applied with this fix? If i just upgrade binutils, will
it solve this problem or i have to rebuild gcc etc etc..

-madhvesh


-------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential and intended only for the use of the =
individual or entity named above and may contain information that is =
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that =
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is strictly =
prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us =
immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the original =
message. - This mail is sent via Sony Asia Pacific Mail Gateway.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 3 Jun 2008 20:18:01 +0530
"Sulibhavi, Madhvesh" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

-----Original Message-----
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:galak@kernel.crashing.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 8:08 PM
To: Josh Boyer
Cc: Sulibhavi, Madhvesh; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; 
rsmadhvesh@vsnl.net; Paul Mackerras
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kprobes for book-e

quoted

This looks like the binutils problem that cell was having and I  
believe Alan Modra fixed:

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2008-05/msg00008.html

Thanks, is it posible to get latest binutils binary which
is applied with this fix? If i just upgrade binutils, will
it solve this problem or i have to rebuild gcc etc etc..

A newer binutils should work just fine.  Also, and older one would
likely work too.  I use either 2.15 or 2.18.

josh

P.S.  You should really get rid of that disclaimer message at the
bottom of your emails.  You're sending to a public list so it makes no
sense.