[patch 3/4] macintosh: replace deprecated __initcall with device_initcall
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: 2008-05-14 23:13:02
Subsystems: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds
Status: Reviewed.
1 review trailer.
7 messages, 3 authors, 2008-05-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Date: 2008-05-14 23:13:02
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <redacted> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <redacted> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <redacted> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> --- drivers/macintosh/adb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -puN drivers/macintosh/adb.c~macintosh-replace-deprecated-__initcall-with-device_initcall drivers/macintosh/adb.c
--- a/drivers/macintosh/adb.c~macintosh-replace-deprecated-__initcall-with-device_initcall
+++ a/drivers/macintosh/adb.c@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ int __init adb_init(void) return 0; } -__initcall(adb_init); +device_initcall(adb_init); static int do_adb_reset_bus(void)
_
From: Paul Mackerras <hidden>
Date: 2008-05-15 04:14:38
akpm@linux-foundation.org writes:
-__initcall(adb_init); +device_initcall(adb_init);
There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there? It looks to me like something that I should queue up for 2.6.27. Paul.
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-05-15 06:07:26
On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] wrote:
akpm@linux-foundation.org writes:quoted
-__initcall(adb_init); +device_initcall(adb_init);There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there? It looks to me like something that I should queue up for 2.6.27.
No, this make no difference in code generation - it's just a use-the-modern-interface thing.
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2008-05-15 06:28:28
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
akpm@linux-foundation.org writes:quoted
-__initcall(adb_init); +device_initcall(adb_init);There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there? It looks to me like something that I should queue up for 2.6.27.No, this make no difference in code generation - it's just a use-the-modern-interface thing.
I missed the memo about __initcall being deprecated, or is it only deprecated for use in device drivers? cheers -- Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-05-15 06:41:13
On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:28:28 +1000 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
akpm@linux-foundation.org writes:quoted
-__initcall(adb_init); +device_initcall(adb_init);There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there? It looks to me like something that I should queue up for 2.6.27.No, this make no difference in code generation - it's just a use-the-modern-interface thing.I missed the memo about __initcall being deprecated, or is it only deprecated for use in device drivers?
It's just old-fashioned, that's all.
#define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
#define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
#define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
#define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
#define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
#define arch_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("3",fn,3)
#define arch_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("3s",fn,3s)
#define subsys_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("4",fn,4)
#define subsys_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("4s",fn,4s)
#define fs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("5",fn,5)
#define fs_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("5s",fn,5s)
#define rootfs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("rootfs",fn,rootfs)
#define device_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("6",fn,6)
#define device_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("6s",fn,6s)
#define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("7",fn,7)
#define late_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("7s",fn,7s)
#define __initcall(fn) device_initcall(fn)
See, we have the nicely-ordered foo_initcall()'s, and the old-fashioned
legacy __initcall happens to map onto device_initcall().
Such code should use device_initcall() directly. So we see at which
stage in initcalls this function will be called.
From: Michael Ellerman <hidden>
Date: 2008-05-15 09:08:37
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:28:28 +1000 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
akpm@linux-foundation.org writes:quoted
-__initcall(adb_init); +device_initcall(adb_init);There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there? It looks to me like something that I should queue up for 2.6.27.No, this make no difference in code generation - it's just a use-the-modern-interface thing.I missed the memo about __initcall being deprecated, or is it only deprecated for use in device drivers?It's just old-fashioned, that's all. #define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0) #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1) #define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s) #define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2) #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s) #define arch_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("3",fn,3) #define arch_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("3s",fn,3s) #define subsys_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("4",fn,4) #define subsys_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("4s",fn,4s) #define fs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("5",fn,5) #define fs_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("5s",fn,5s) #define rootfs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("rootfs",fn,rootfs) #define device_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("6",fn,6) #define device_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("6s",fn,6s) #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("7",fn,7) #define late_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("7s",fn,7s)
Yeah fair enough.
A little git'ing tells me there were 31 new __initcall()'s added between
2.6.24 and 2.6.25, and there are 12 more lurking between 2.6.25 and
linux-next. They're breeding!
You can't stick a #warning inside a #define can you? How about:
#define __initcall(fn) \
do { \
int Use_device_initcall_not___initcall_please; \
device_initcall(fn); \
} while (0)
Which gives:
warning: unused variable ‘Use_device_initcall_not___initcall_please’
..
Yeah OK that was a joke.
cheers
--
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab
wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)
We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2008-05-15 17:43:44
On Thu, 15 May 2008 19:08:37 +1000 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:41 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
On Thu, 15 May 2008 16:28:28 +1000 Michael Ellerman [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 23:06 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
On Thu, 15 May 2008 14:14:38 +1000 Paul Mackerras [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
akpm@linux-foundation.org writes:quoted
-__initcall(adb_init); +device_initcall(adb_init);There's no particular reason why this needs to go in 2.6.26, is there? It looks to me like something that I should queue up for 2.6.27.No, this make no difference in code generation - it's just a use-the-modern-interface thing.I missed the memo about __initcall being deprecated, or is it only deprecated for use in device drivers?It's just old-fashioned, that's all. #define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0) #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1) #define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s) #define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2) #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s) #define arch_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("3",fn,3) #define arch_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("3s",fn,3s) #define subsys_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("4",fn,4) #define subsys_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("4s",fn,4s) #define fs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("5",fn,5) #define fs_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("5s",fn,5s) #define rootfs_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("rootfs",fn,rootfs) #define device_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("6",fn,6) #define device_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("6s",fn,6s) #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("7",fn,7)
I'm sure Andy can give us a checkpatch warning when someone uses __initcall. That'll help a bit.