# Re: Sequoia build with KDBG

- List: linuxppc-dev
- 2 messages, 2 authors
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2008/03/9437489/t

## Re: Sequoia build with KDBG

- From: Wolfgang Denk \<hidden\>
- Date: 2008-03-01 00:40:10 
- Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2008/03/9437489.md

```text
In message [ref] you wrote:
>
> I assumed that because I've always needed a debugger when 
> implementing kernel level components. Since you've implemented kernel 
> level support for several 44x processors, I just assumed that you 
> needed kdbg at some point. So you're saying that your additions 
> worked right out of the gate and you never needed a debugger?  You're my hero!

Many people working on this stuff use a BDI2000 / BDI3000. Makes life
much easier...

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
I have the simplest tastes.  I am always satisfied with the best.
                                                       -- Oscar Wilde
```

## Re: Sequoia build with KDBG

- From: Steve Heflin \<hidden\>
- Date: 2008-03-01 01:47:47 
- Message: https://ratatoskr.run/linuxppc-dev/2008/03/9437490.md

```text
At 07:16 PM 2/29/2008, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>In message [ref] you wrote:
> >
> > I assumed that because I've always needed a debugger when
> > implementing kernel level components. Since you've implemented kernel
> > level support for several 44x processors, I just assumed that you
> > needed kdbg at some point. So you're saying that your additions
> > worked right out of the gate and you never needed a debugger?  You're my hero!
>
>Many people working on this stuff use a BDI2000 / BDI3000. Makes life
>much easier...

Wolfgang, you hit the nail on the head. Trying to debug a target without a JTAG debugger is a pain.
```