From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Date: 2007-09-09 18:21:21
The trick for finding the right defconfig is neat, but you forgot to
provide an i686_defconfig. ;-)
More seriously, cross compiling the defconfig is often useful, e.g. for
testing the compilation of patches that touch multiple architectures,
and this patch therefore chooses g5_defconfig if $(CROSS_COMPILE) is
non-empty.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
---
0b0e6e0e3a16f48348cb9c40ef1bb55ef42f92eb
From: Sam Ravnborg <hidden> Date: 2007-09-09 18:38:18
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:21:17PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The trick for finding the right defconfig is neat, but you forgot to
provide an i686_defconfig. ;-)
More seriously, cross compiling the defconfig is often useful, e.g. for
testing the compilation of patches that touch multiple architectures,
and this patch therefore chooses g5_defconfig if $(CROSS_COMPILE) is
non-empty.
Thanks - much appreciated.
Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <redacted>
Sam
From: Olof Johansson <hidden> Date: 2007-09-09 20:39:55
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 08:21:17PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
The trick for finding the right defconfig is neat, but you forgot to
provide an i686_defconfig. ;-)
More seriously, cross compiling the defconfig is often useful, e.g. for
testing the compilation of patches that touch multiple architectures,
and this patch therefore chooses g5_defconfig if $(CROSS_COMPILE) is
non-empty.
You should probably use ppc64_defconfig instead, since it's the "superset"
config that will compile a multiplatform kernel.
-Olof