DTC 1.0.0 Release

Hey guys,

Well, I tagged and released an official DTC v1.0.0 Release
and pushed it out to jdl.com just now.  You can grab the
git repo directly:

    git://www.jdl.com/software/dtc.git

or download a tarball here:

    http://www.jdl.com/software/dtc-1.0.0.tgz

As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.

Thanks,
jdl


PS -- Hey Becky!  So there!  My status report doesn't lie!

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:01:33PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:

Hey guys,

Well, I tagged and released an official DTC v1.0.0 Release
and pushed it out to jdl.com just now.  You can grab the
git repo directly:

    git://www.jdl.com/software/dtc.git

or download a tarball here:

    http://www.jdl.com/software/dtc-1.0.0.tgz

As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.

Well, I'm not thrilled about the versioning, nor some inaccuracies in
the new documentation.  But as you say in the commit message, it's
about bloody time, we can fix the problems later.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 11:25 +1000, David Gibson wrote:

On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:01:33PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:

quoted

Hey guys,

Well, I tagged and released an official DTC v1.0.0 Release
and pushed it out to jdl.com just now.  You can grab the
git repo directly:

    git://www.jdl.com/software/dtc.git

or download a tarball here:

    http://www.jdl.com/software/dtc-1.0.0.tgz

As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.

Well, I'm not thrilled about the versioning, nor some inaccuracies in
the new documentation.  But as you say in the commit message, it's
about bloody time, we can fix the problems later.

Everyone knows not to use x.0.0 releases anyway, so hurry up and push
out 1.0.1 ;)

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

On Thu, Aug 09, Jon Loeliger wrote:

As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.

tests/truncated_property.c:45: warning: 'err' is used uninitialized in this function

(untested patch)

---
 tests/truncated_property.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/tests/truncated_property.c
+++ b/tests/truncated_property.c

@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 	void *fdt = &_truncated_property;
 	const void *prop;
-	int err;
 	int len;
 
 	test_init(argc, argv);

@@ -43,7 +42,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 		FAIL("fdt_getprop() succeeded on truncated property");
 	if (len != -FDT_ERR_BADSTRUCTURE)
 		FAIL("fdt_getprop() failed with \"%s\" instead of \"%s\"",
-		     fdt_strerror(err), fdt_strerror(-FDT_ERR_BADSTRUCTURE));
+		     fdt_strerror(len), fdt_strerror(-FDT_ERR_BADSTRUCTURE));
 
 	PASS();
 }

On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:21:29PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:

On Thu, Aug 09, Jon Loeliger wrote:

quoted

As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.

tests/truncated_property.c:45: warning: 'err' is used uninitialized
in this function

Looks good.  If you had a Signed-off-by, I'd add an Acked-by...

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 19:50, David Gibson wrote:

On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 11:21:29PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Aug 09, Jon Loeliger wrote:

quoted

As usual, please let me know of any issues with it.

tests/truncated_property.c:45: warning: 'err' is used uninitialized
in this function

Looks good.  If you had a Signed-off-by, I'd add an Acked-by...

... I'd apply it and start us on the way to some
other release!

Thanks,
jdl