The powerpc arch uses CONFIG_PPC instead of CONFIG_POWERPC. This fixes
drivers/rtc/Kconfig to use the correct config option.
Signed-off-by: Wade Farnsworth <redacted>
---
This is a resubmission of a patch I sent a few weeks ago. I'm
resubmitting this as I haven't seen any activity regarding this patch
since I submitted it.
drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6-powerpc-8641/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
===================================================================
From: Jon Loeliger <hidden> Date: 2007-06-06 17:07:36
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 11:57, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
The powerpc arch uses CONFIG_PPC instead of CONFIG_POWERPC. This fixes
drivers/rtc/Kconfig to use the correct config option.
Signed-off-by: Wade Farnsworth <redacted>
---
This is a resubmission of a patch I sent a few weeks ago. I'm
resubmitting this as I haven't seen any activity regarding this patch
since I submitted it.
Did you miss where I ACK'ed it 16-May-2007? :-)
From: Jon Loeliger [off-list ref]
To: Wade Farnsworth [off-list ref]
Cc: linuxppc-dev [off-list ref], rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix drivers/rtc/Kconfig for powerpc
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:31:26 -0500
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 11:53, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> The powerpc arch uses CONFIG_PPC instead of CONFIG_POWERPC. This makes
> drivers/rtc/Kconfig to use the correct config option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wade Farnsworth [off-list ref]
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger [off-list ref]
jdl
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 12:07 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 11:57, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
quoted
The powerpc arch uses CONFIG_PPC instead of CONFIG_POWERPC. This fixes
drivers/rtc/Kconfig to use the correct config option.
Signed-off-by: Wade Farnsworth <redacted>
---
This is a resubmission of a patch I sent a few weeks ago. I'm
resubmitting this as I haven't seen any activity regarding this patch
since I submitted it.
Did you miss where I ACK'ed it 16-May-2007? :-)
Ah okay, maybe I don't understand what that means. When you say
"Acked-by" does that mean you'll push it upstream?
What I meant was I haven't seen anybody pick up this patch yet, and
would like to know it if will be, or if there is something else I need
to do.
--Wade
From: Jon Loeliger [off-list ref]
To: Wade Farnsworth [off-list ref]
Cc: linuxppc-dev [off-list ref], rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix drivers/rtc/Kconfig for powerpc
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 11:31:26 -0500
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 11:53, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
> The powerpc arch uses CONFIG_PPC instead of CONFIG_POWERPC. This makes
> drivers/rtc/Kconfig to use the correct config option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wade Farnsworth [off-list ref]
Acked-by: Jon Loeliger [off-list ref]
jdl
From: Jon Loeliger <hidden> Date: 2007-06-07 16:08:42
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 12:17, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
quoted
Did you miss where I ACK'ed it 16-May-2007? :-)
Ah okay, maybe I don't understand what that means. When you say
"Acked-by" does that mean you'll push it upstream?
I meant that I picked the patch up, applied it to my tree,
tested it, and verified that _I_ thought it was good.
It received my Vote of Confidence, for whatever that is worth.
What I meant was I haven't seen anybody pick up this patch yet, and
would like to know it if will be, or if there is something else I need
to do.
Right. This patch is in "generic" PowerPC related code,
and not in my area to "push upstream". I would expect, say,
Paul to pick it up directly. Perhaps Kumar would pick it up
and stage it for Paul. Perhaps akpm would pick it up. :-)
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 11:08 -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 12:17, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
quoted
quoted
Did you miss where I ACK'ed it 16-May-2007? :-)
Ah okay, maybe I don't understand what that means. When you say
"Acked-by" does that mean you'll push it upstream?
I meant that I picked the patch up, applied it to my tree,
tested it, and verified that _I_ thought it was good.
It received my Vote of Confidence, for whatever that is worth.
Ok. Thanks for acking it by the way.
quoted
What I meant was I haven't seen anybody pick up this patch yet, and
would like to know it if will be, or if there is something else I need
to do.
Right. This patch is in "generic" PowerPC related code,
and not in my area to "push upstream". I would expect, say,
Paul to pick it up directly. Perhaps Kumar would pick it up
and stage it for Paul. Perhaps akpm would pick it up. :-)
But since this is in drivers/rtc/Kconfig, wouldn't the maintainer of
that subsystem be expected to pick this up?
Thanks for the clarifications.
--Wade
From: David Gibson <hidden> Date: 2007-06-07 23:34:31
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 11:37:46AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 11:33, Wade Farnsworth wrote:
quoted
But since this is in drivers/rtc/Kconfig, wouldn't the maintainer of
that subsystem be expected to pick this up?
Oh, sure. In which case he/she may be waiting on
someone over in PowerPC land to ACK it first. :-)
Dunno.
Sure. This patch is so simple though, I think it could go straight to
Andrew Morton.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson